This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
How edible/inedible is it? I hesitate to take a gulp out of the can I have, given that it has been diluted with turpentine ;) --
GSchjetne (
talk)
09:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)reply
"For example, Danish Oil has been thought to have tung oil in it."
Thanks for the article; this couplet doesn't make sense: "Product packaging will usually clearly state if it is pure tung oil. For example, Danish Oil has been thought to have tung oil in it." I can't parse the second sentence as a logical example of the first sentence... Is the point of the second sentence that Danish Oil does not in fact have tung oil in it, and people have incorrectly believed it to have tung oil? Or that Danish Oil does have tung oil in it and states as much, but these sentences are awkwardly worded? In either case, the fact that people have thought that Danish Oil had tung oil in it is not an "example" of product packaging clearly stating (or not) that a product is pure tung oil, at least without further explanation.
Chconnor (
talk)
18:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)reply