A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 10, 2012, March 10, 2014, March 10, 2015, and March 10, 2017. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have changed the description of the British colonial government from "without the false pretense of...the current system" to "without the pretense of democracy" period. What constitute false and whether the British colonial establishment is any less hypocritical than the current HKSAR Government is a matter of pov. Wikipedia should be neutral when it comes to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hker1997 ( talk • contribs) 16:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone moved the page to TungWARNING! Chee Hwa and I moved that page back here. I am not sure if the fault lies with me, but none of the history seems to be there anymore. There wasn't a history before I moved it either, but my apologies if I handled that incorreclty. Gantry 12:34, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
How is it "officially Tung Chee-hwa"? -- Jiang
Puppet government is a bit too strong for the SAR government. Roadrunner 04:18, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
would anyone know the education background of Mr Tung?
I heard that he read engineering in the UK. (however, his mentality is not very "westernized")
The Hong Kong government site seems to be of the opinion that his term was only up to until 11th March, though his resignation was only confirmed late on 12th March. Should the article use the 11th March date? -- KittySaturn 12:00, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
It is a bad structure to have internal links listed under the section header of "External links" This problem is widespread in many pages in this catagory. Kowloonese 19:13, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
We've heard myriads of Tung's famous (infamous, though, to someone) dicta like, typically: "If Hong Kong is fine, then China will be fine; if China will be fine, then every one will be fine." Sadly, I can't see anyone has written down any fabulous quotes up to the moment. Now, Regina Ip has her own individual Wikiquote page, so why not our dearest Mr Tung? -- Jerry Crimson Mann 19:09, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Should the Cantonese pronunciation of Tung Chee Hwa's name be added to the page (since he's a HK politician)? Some people reading might be mistakenly led to believe that Tung Chee Hwa is the Cantonese pronuncation of his name. -- Yuje 00:45, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
To all, especially those who are stupid enough to trust To Kit the clown, his father Tung Chao Yung was spelt also in Mandarin Wade-Giles, with the exception of Yung, which is given by Shanghainese [iõ̜]. And Hwa starts with [x], but most Cantonese and British alike, including To Kit the clown, can never make this sound for their entire lives anyway. In Gwoyeu Romatzyh the first tone of hua is spelt Hua, the second hwa, the third hoa, the fourth huah. -- 218.102.23.80 01:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
the first paragraph of this article is rendered illegible by the patchwork of blue and black type. frivolous links should be eliminated and the rest rearranged.
Image:Tung Chee Hwa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I disambiguated his nationality (Chinese) in the infobox to Hong Kong, and it was reverted with the notice that there is no such nationality as "Hong Kong". Fair enough. But Chinese links to a dab page, and is also rather nonspecific in context. I've therefore changed it to PRC. I suspect this is a can of worms.... -- Hongooi 00:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I've removed unsourced POV claims and put some citation tags in the article. Hong Qi Gong ( Talk - Contribs) 18:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I've noted NPOV. This article is biased in favour of the subject, and larded with pro-Beijing/anti-British rhetoric. (my bolding)
I've reverted some of this POV, introduced on 25 Aug 08 by Bocaveritas (defunct account only two months later). See my edits today. Earthlyreason ( talk) 10:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Image:TCWandCP.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I've changed the article back to reflecting the unhypenated name which was used prior to this edit [1] which I presume was made by mistake. If the most common or preferred romanisation is unhyphenated then that should be reflect in the article. In any case, this sort of thing should be consistent with the article title Nil Einne ( talk) 05:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Is Tung a buddhist? ( edit without reference)--- North south 101 ( talk) 00:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 ( talk) 12:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Tung Chee Hwa →
Tung Chee-hwa – Consistency with other Cantonese name articles without English name, and most articles on Wikipedia refer him as "Tung Chee-hwa" regardless. There is not enough source to support this article to be an exception. Relisted.
Jenks24 (
talk) 08:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Relisted.
Jenks24 (
talk) 13:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
ThisAvatar (
discuss–
?)
21:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tung Chee-hwa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)