This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Why are you so against the LGBT community Fred? Why this harassment? Have you pulled this same crap with San Diego, Long Beach or San Francisco Pride? I WILL be making this a public media issue and have screencaps of all this. If you can discriminate against the LGBT communty here on Wikipedia then I think the public deserves to know it. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Robert Rowlkey (
talk •
contribs)
20:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Robert Rowlkey: There was nothing in C. Fred's actions that should be deemed as harassment. You are, by your own admission, connected to this organization, so the "connected contributor" tag on the article was appropriate. It didn't mean that the article was facing deletion; only that other editors would recognize that the article might not represent a wide enough viewpoint of the organization and some scrutiny might be paid to it. Such scrutiny can only improve an article (although not necessarily in the eyes of the connected contributor).
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!20:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
After reading over the page, the event and group does seem to meet
WP:GNG for an article here. I restored the page itself, as it does read from a neutral POV, and is well sourced. If there's a concern over a COI, that needs to be taken up at the
COI noticeboard.
Wildthing61476 (
talk)
20:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for letting me know. I'd remove it again and report him at the already open thread at
WP:ANI. I'll report it of you like. He doesn't need another target for his personal attacks.
John from Idegon (
talk)
20:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply