This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all
Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to
join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
The section of this article must be developed first
The section on which this belongs must be developed first. I think we must never do an article from a section unless that section has enough verifiable info to stand by itself and thus is an article in its own right. Imagine,
the Kammuri section has very meagre (though verifiable) information that I think is just a paragraph or two. You know, it's like constructing an essay with only its introduction having been finished... Expand the section where this article came from first, then make this article again -
Pika ten10 (
talk)
12:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Whilst i agree that the Kammuri section on the WPac article must be developed I disagree on merging as this Storm obviously has enough infomation to deserve an article though it is still early days . Also if this article goes then the Cristobell article must also be merged into the Atlantic Hurricane Article as the section on Cristoball is only a paragraph
Jason Rees (
talk)
12:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, for the meantime I agree with you. But I shall have it on the grounds that this article must be developed the earliest time possible, or else I shall push through merging this article with
mentioned section above. Is it all right with you??? -
Pika ten10 (
talk)
12:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Yep thats fine - I will be developing this article over the next few days as impact reports come in and i have also brought upto date the Kammuri section
Jason Rees (
talk)
12:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Right ive Webcited your reference but be warned we have to stick to JMA info as they are the offical RSMC for the basin who use 10 mins
Jason Rees (
talk)
00:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Nah i suggest that we just leave it here as all the Storm history is complete its just getting the Impact section sorted. which should be done over the next couple of days as more reports come in
Jason Rees (
talk)
19:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Just wondering if Elida's remnants was associated or no because when Elida's remnants cross into the area, it strengthed(on 27th which is the time might devolope Kammuri)
HurricaneSpin (
talk)
01:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The upper level clouds did cross the basin but only the pressure is very high and it might be some kind of other wave associated with. But I still don't understand what is dissipate because some place said it twice like Arthur's "dissipate advisory" and "it dissipated in the Pacific ocean. And Marie' remnants hanged like two weeks and originally came from Atlantic Ocean, Ike possibly came from Indian Ocean. Dosent some waves go cross the whole world?
HurricaneSpin (
talk)
02:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Tropical Waves normally don't last long enough to cross the world. By the way, Elida's remnants became extratropical by Hawaii, (I remember that). And Ike couldn't have came from the indian ocean, it would have had to cross the middle east, the driest place in the world. --
SaolaTalk to Me04:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The origins of Ike have actually been traced back all the way to Sudan, Isabel of 2003 was even traced back into the Arabian Sea. Also, the distance the storm would have to travel would be way to far.
Cyclonebiskit04:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Forgot about Isabel, oh well, the likelyhood of a tropical wave traveling across the world probably would be low, it can be sheared, absorbed, become extratropical, all the "fun" stuff! --
Yueof the North06:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Tropical Storm Kammuri (2008). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 4 external links on
Tropical Storm Kammuri (2008). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.