This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tropical Storm Dujuan (2021) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2021 Pacific typhoon season was copied or moved into Tropical Storm Dujuan (2021) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Can all the Information be fixed here? because I can't edit now because I'm busy working, Thank you very much. Shadzarie ( talk) 01:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Should AON be used as a source for the infobox and the lead? There damage estimates are $10 million opposed the $2 million by the NRRDMC. DachshundLover82 ( talk) 03:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Personally I think that AON is only acceptable as a source for damage estimates when we have nothing else. In this case we have the NDRRMC who are estimating the damage and are used by PAGASA etc to determine the official damage estimates as well as any retirees.
Jason Rees (
talk)
19:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)