This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
I wrote it because it was requested at the Article request and you agreed that there should be a separate artice on this storm.
Storm0513:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I only agreed because, at the time, I thought more information would have been available for a fuller article. That doesn't seem to be the case. I'll go back and revote for all articles.
Hurricanehink16:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Also you did not revote all the storms you only revoted only the Alantic Storms from 1958 to 1999 and ignored the votes from the pre 1950 Atlantic storms, WPAC, EPAC and S. Hemisphere storms.
Storm0517:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I disagree. That's not enough damage and the article isn't that great. At least 15 dead and/or $300 million in damage is the threshold in my book. There are a couple storm articles that fail to meet that criteria but, then again, it's just my opinion. --
§HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive22:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)reply
<--- unindented... I'd like to think my copyedit(s) of this article went quite a way to improving it.
NSLE(
T+
C)(
seen this?) at 01:08
UTC (
2006-04-12)
Once again, I'm most impressed with your work! As per our recent interaction, I did a copyedit (
here's the diff). I have just a few suggestions/comments left for you, and then will obviously be happy to promote. :)
Keilana|Parlez ici23:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Your use of "decreased...increase...decreased" gets a bit repetitive in the first paragraph of MH.
In "such winds were not known", I'm not sure "known" is the best word choice (also goes for "the strongest winds known at the time". Maybe "observed"? Or is that inaccurate?
That's inaccurate, actually. The winds were observed, but the NHC didn't know about them at the time. The agency often gets wind reports after the fact, which can alter how strong they thought the storm was. --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
15:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)reply
You wrote "In Saint Vincent, there was minor roof damage. In Dominica, the storm damaged roads and caused power outages." Did it hit either of those islands directly?
The phrase "the effects from the storm affected" demonstrates a remarkable understanding of when to use "effect" and "affect". Nevertheless, it's awkward. :)
Is there any estimate for how long it took the St. Lucian government to fix all the stuff Debby broke?
Unfortunately, the damage was small enough that there weren't updates on fixing the damage (unlike a storm like Katrina, which remained in the news). --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
15:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Did Debby hit Hispaniola as a tropical storm or as remnants?
What about that sentence ("After Debby dissipated, its remnants maintained strong winds, and a station in the Dominican Republic reported a gust of 62 mph (100 km/h) on September 11") was confusing? Just curious... ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
15:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)reply
...I think I printed a different version, 'cause I never read that. What you wrote is lovely and quite clear!
I'm not concerned about more specificity with the woman in Martinique, so I'm going to promote. Thanks for making GAN reviewing pleasant and easy! Good luck at FAC!
Keilana|Parlez ici01:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)reply