From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tropical Storm Arlene (1959) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria . If you can improve it further,
please do so . If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it .
Tropical Storm Arlene (1959) is part of the
1959 Atlantic hurricane season series , a
good topic . It is also part of the
Off-season Atlantic hurricanes series , a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the
Wikipedia community . If you can update or improve them,
please do so .
Article milestonesDate Process Result
October 13, 2008
Good article nominee Listed April 5, 2011
Good topic candidate Promoted July 3, 2013
Good topic candidate Promoted Current status: Good article
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1959)/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon.
Dana boomer (
talk )
19:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (
MoS ) :
In the second paragraph of the lead, you say "Arlene dropped heavy rains totaling up to as it moved" I think you're missing a number here...
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars etc. :
It is illustrated by
images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
One tiny little issue with some missing info in a sentence, and the article will be good to go for GA. I'm placing the article on hold until this issue can be fixed. Drop me a note here or on my talk page if you have any questions.
Dana boomer (
talk )
19:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Ok, I've added that it totaled over two feet in localized areas.
Cyclonebiskit (
talk )
19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. Nice job!
Dana boomer (
talk )
19:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Thanks :)
Cyclonebiskit (
talk )
20:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply