Triangle Link has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 8, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Highways: Europe Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the European Highways Task Force. Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Triangle Link/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Albacore ( talk · contribs) 15:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I will review this article shortly. Albacore ( talk) 15:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

• File:Hordaland(1979).jpg and File:MF Bjørnefjord (1986).jpg need information templates at the Commons. Not required but File:Trekantsambandet.jpg could use a description in English.
  • Well beyond the GA criteria, but I can have a look at it. The first two images I haven't had anything to do with, while the latter is my own and I guess I should have added an English description. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• No DABs or deadlinks

• References check out for proper and consistent style.

• The section form Sveio to Stord is part of form is from?
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• The section from Stord to Sveio, including the Stord Bridge and the Bømlafjord Tunnel, is part of E39—the Coastal Highway which runs along the west coast of Norway. Why is coastal highway capitalized?
  • Because the E39 is also named the "Coastal Highway" (Kystriksveien). I have rearranged the punctuation a bit to make it a bit more clear. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• The tunnel has three lanes, one downwards and two upwards This could use some clarification, I don't know what you mean by "one downwards" and "two upwards". One lane going to Sevio and two to Føyno or the other way around?
  • I've rephrased to "downhill" and "uphill" and added a short comment. Which direction has two lanes depends on where in the tunnel one is. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• It is 1,077 meters (3,533 ft) long and has a main span of 677 meters (2,221 ft). 1. Span could link to Span (architecture). 2. I have read our Span (architecture) article and I don't know what the span is, some explanation here would be nice. Is the span the distance between beams?
  • The span is the distance between two supporting columns. I've linked span in the lead (first mention) and explained it very briefly in the body. If the reader doesn't understand span they probably don't know what a pylon is either, so I added an "aka" as well. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• The bridge has two 105-meter (344 ft) tall pylons, one foundationed on Brunsholmen and one on Spissøy. The bridge... "The bridge" starting two sentences consecutively is repetitive.
  • There is a sentence in between, but I guess it is better to not start three consecutive sentences with "the". Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• Any more information on the Spissøy Bridge would be appreciated since it only gets one sentence here.
  • There isn't much to say about the bridge, that type are a dime a dozen. The price is mentioned in the "construction" section, otherwise the book and other sources don't say much more about it. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• In Bømlo, there was built a new road across the islands of Spissøy and Nautøy—... suggested change to In Bømlo, there was a new road built across the islands of Spissøy and Nautøy—... for better flow of the text.
  • Good idea. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• However, local traffic from Føyno to Bømlo do not have to pay. what is "local traffic"?
  • Perhaps a rather Norwegianized term, but my dictionary says it exists in English. I've rephrased to make it less ambiguous. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• The plaza is constructed as a grade-separated intersection what is a "grade-separated intersection"?
  • The article links to grade separation, which explains the concept well. I've added two-level, which is not a good term but might help the reader a bit. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• However, local traffic from Føyno to Bømlo do not have to pay. should "do" be "does" here? I'm unsure, I would appreciate an explanation.
  • Does would be better, I agree. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• To illustrate their point, one ship-owner... Unhyphenate ship-owner.
  • My dictionary actually says that it is a single word, so I changed to "shipowner". Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• I'm to the "opposition" section. Albacore ( talk) 18:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• ... SBT started negotiating loans with various banks to receive financial guarantees fro the... for?
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• pay the whole fixed link with the saved-up funds saved-up ->> accumulated?
  • Yes, that would be better. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• against the project was from Stord, while in Bømlo there overwhelming support. there was overwhelming support
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• The following week, Sveio Municipal Council voted in favor the Triangle Link, without debate this is ambiguous, was there debate and no one dissented or was there no actual debate?
  • No actual debate, no dissent. Clarified. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• During late 1989, advance tolls on the ferries was approved was should be were, I think
  • Yep. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• ... proposed that the project be considered outside the normal road plans. What is meant by "outside the normal plans"?
  • changed to "proposed that the project be considered independent of the regular national road plans" which I hope reads better. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• 144 against 20 votes, to build the Triangel Link spelling mistake?
  • Thanks. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• I'm to the "Construction" section. Albacore ( talk) 18:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• In average, the tunnel was built at a speed of 55 meters (180 ft) per week... ->> The tunnel was built at an average speed of 55 meters (180 ft) per week better wording
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• I have been busy throughout the review, and I appreciate your patience. I will pass when the one issue is fixed. Albacore ( talk) 20:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• Thank you very much for the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Triangle Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100315153849/http://www.trekantsambandet.no/PrisarogAvtale.aspx to http://www.trekantsambandet.no/PrisarogAvtale.aspx
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ssb.no/kommvalg/histtab/t-1991abs.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ssb.no/kommvalg/histtab/t-1987abs.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trekantsambandet.no/Ombompengeselskapet.aspx
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sbt.no/SBT-2010_nett.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/nyheter/lokalt/Bommet-med-900-millioner-2375308.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/nyheter/lokalt/Innrommer-manglende-veistyring-2413311.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/na24/Brukte-118000-bompengekroner-pa-tur-til-USA-2475178.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://old.bt.no/na24/Trekker-seg-fra-bomselskap-7083.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://old.bt.no/nyheter/lokalt/Full-utskifting-i-Trekantsambandet-5190.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/nyheter/lokalt/Bomselskap-inn-pa-den-smale-veg-2290172.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/nyheter/innenriks/For-mye-bompenger-gar-til-styrehonorarer-1838938.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://bil.bt.no/bil/Ostlendinger-betaler-mest-i-bompenger-7574.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bt.no/nyheter/okonomi/Snart-vert-dette-heilt-gratis-2831808.html
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.trekantsambandet.no/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC) reply