![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I reverted, however removed 'alleged' - a POV slipup on my part. This is only affecting the small proportion of users who are using said banned trackers. Whether or not it is a problem is up for debate given that two parties have offered differing opinions on the matter. Thus, why should it take up such a large proportion of the article (as it did in the previous edit)? This is an encyclopaedia, not a place to air grievances. At this rate, we'll have an essay on the merits of announce times, with footnotes from the forum thread to boot! Fight your battles in the appropriate places. Suicup 14:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Thats probably fair enough, but the current thread link in the article is primarily a discussion on the clients first banning, not its announce interval problems. I think think the other thread link (the ' banned again' one) is probably a bit more informative, especially since it has several comments from various developers as well as the author of the patch that fixes the issue and exactly why it is a problem. I still think 'whether or not it is really a problem' implies some sort of doubt on the claim that it hammers the tracker rather than conveying the message that the authors of the program have done this by design though. Evilgrug 15:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I have read through the relevant thread and it seems the lead developer (titer) is working on a solution which will 'make everyone happy' (his words) [1]. The reason i said it isn't a problem per se is that a) it seems this issue only affects a small number of people and b) the developers (at least in that thread) don't think it is a 'problem'. Thus, given it is their software, and i don't think they are being intentionally malicious, i think we should give them the benefit of the doubt. Given we are writing an encyclopaedia article we should be looking at the entire picture, not just from the perspective a microcosm of Transmission users. I will change the link though. Cheers Suicup 09:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
could someone confirm, can transmission be run from a CLI but has GUI as well (like a lot of Linux software) Ms.henrick ( talk) 16:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Transmission 1.92 (10363) - http://www.transmissionbt.com/
A fast and easy BitTorrent client
Usage: transmissioncli [options] <file|url|magnet>
Options:
-h --help Display this help page and exit
-a --announce <url> Set the new torrent's announce URL
-b --blocklist Enable peer blocklists
-B --no-blocklist Disable peer blocklists
-c --comment <comment> Set the new torrent's comment
-d --downlimit <speed> Set max download speed in KB/s
-D --no-downlimit Don't limit the download speed
-er --encryption-required Encrypt all peer connections
-ep --encryption-preferred Prefer encrypted peer connections
-et --encryption-tolerated Prefer unencrypted peer connections
-f --finish <script> Run a script when the torrent finishes
-g --config-dir <path> Where to find configuration files
-i --info Show torrent details and exit
-m --portmap Enable portmapping via NAT-PMP or UPnP
-M --no-portmap Disable portmapping
-n --new <syntaxhighlight> Create a new torrent
-p --port <port> Port for incoming peers (Default: 51413)
-r --private Set the new torrent's 'private' flag
-s --scrape Scrape the torrent and exit
---more---
ThyArmageddon ( talk) 21:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
The current license (below) indicates that only portions of Transmission are licensed under the MIT license, the rest under a modified GPL v2 license. As such, the MIT-license portions cannot run without the GPL portions, so the project should probably just be classified as using a modified GPL v2 license.
The OS X client, CLI client, and parts of libtransmission are licensed
under the terms of the MIT license.
The Transmission daemon, GTK+ client, Qt client, Web client, and most of
libtransmission are licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL version 2,
with two special exceptions:
1. The MIT-licensed portions of Transmission listed above are exempt
from GPLv2 clause 2(b) and may retain their MIT license.
2. Permission is granted to link the code in this release with the
OpenSSL project's 'OpenSSL' library and to distribute the linked
executables. Works derived from Transmission may, at their authors'
discretion, keep or delete this exception.
Does anyone think that it would be a good idea to start a section on iTransmission (the iDevice BitTorent client)? Apparently it uses the same source code as Transmission. Tonyxc600 ( talk) 11:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) Calidum T| C 05:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Transmission (BitTorrent client) →
Transmission (software) – More common taxo. --Relisted.
George Ho (
talk)
18:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC) –
RezonansowyakaRezy (
talk
The code has been moved to Github, yet the repository URL in the infobox points to their old TRAC. I haven't found out how to change the URL :S. Orgyn ( talk) 13:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Transmission (BitTorrent client). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Transmission (BitTorrent client). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://trqtw.sourceforge.net/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)