This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This is a very important hydrometeorological term. While that particular google search yielded few hits, it is a term used often by
NOAA in its predictions. A merge discussion is ongoing with
Storm train, so I believe this deletion request is inappropriate. I have removed the template.-RunningOnBrains17:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I know, and it's OK, I thought the same thing, but I didn't remove it because I didn't want to start an edit war. I was actually slightly upset with this user, because he/she tagged up almost all the articles I created, and seems to be doing excessive tagging to other articles as well, including this one. This user was
User:Bongomatic. Thanks for resolving the deletion issue. Anyway, I would like to discuss the merging concern
here. --
IRP☎23:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I would support getting rid of the questionable notability guideline tag. Yes, the article is short, but there is potential for it to grow, and training is a the cause of many floods.
WxGopher (
talk)
16:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)reply
How about the separate article being named "thunderstorm-training", and unmerged? That seems to be more common, and it was actually used on an
NWS warning. --
IRP☎15:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)reply
You can find the text by pressing CTRL+F, and entering (without quotes): "thunderstorm training".