This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Torre Ejecutiva Pemex explosion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving Torre Ejecutiva Pemex explosion was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 February 2013. | ![]() |
![]() | This page incorporates content from Explosión de la Torre Ejecutiva Pemex de 2013, a page hosted on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 31, 2018 and January 31, 2021. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have added incident aftermath and timeline sections which are translated from the Spanish article. Can someone who knows how add the requisite template reflecting this? Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 19:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Please, oh please can we stop adding the mainly unreferenced "timeline" to this article, at least until it's no longer on the main page? The Rambling Man ( talk) 22:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that the article uses the word "tweet" and related terms to refer to Twitter posts. I feel that this is non-neutral in a subtle way -- to fully understand this article, you must accept Twitter's marketing terminology. I would prefer more descriptive terms like "Twitter post" or "Twitter message". Does anyone know if there are any style guidelines pertaining to this? 138.16.21.199 ( talk) 04:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
There are three people missing. Let's stay tuned. [1] ComputerJA ( talk) 23:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
So I'm hearing stories that authorities are withholding information that it was drug cartel related because it sheds light on the incompetence of the administrations "War on drugs". Any truth?
-G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.169.187 ( talk) 02:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Preliminary reports indicate that gas accumulation was the cause of the explosion. [2] ComputerJA ( talk) 03:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
this: "The building was completely evacuated in the minutes following the explosion.[6] In the hours after the blast, about 30 people were reported to be trapped in debris,[6] and searches continued into the next day, as Pemex CEO Emilio Lozoya said there were indications that some people remained under the rubble.[7]"
is contradictory the building was EITHER "completely evacuated in the minutes following the explosion" OR "In the hours after the blast, about 30 people were reported to be trapped in debris"]
could do with a total rewrite too! 188.220.151.59 ( talk) 15:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
This article must be revised to change its present title, as the main building (Tower) was not involved at all in the explosion. It needs to refer to "Edificio B-2" as this was the building affected by the explosion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 ( talk) 15:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)