This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Seen the links (in russian)
-> http://meteoweb.ru/2009/photo20090603.php?pic=P6020047.jpg -> http://ni4egonet.livejournal.com/45763.html; -> http://t1000-fp.livejournal.com/12105.html; -> http://qvintus.livejournal.com/27736.html; -> http://mutterdu.livejournal.com/12810.html. -> http://bukvalno.livejournal.com/30206.html -> (video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hepo-rtoQc -> (video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfH7C0c2_Mg -> http://sholademi.livejournal.com/1108528.html -> http://users.livejournal.com/_quasar/132524.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.41.45.42 ( talk) 13:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
There have been a few European tornadoes this year but there is no archive link for the ESSL to properly reference them, an ideas on how to get around this issue? Cyclone biskit 21:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The death toll was upgraded yet again to 15 in Lone Grove, so I have created an inevitably necessary sub-page: February 2009 tornado outbreak. And now I'm going to bed :-D - Running On Brains 08:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes so am I, I'll work on it tommorrow. I can't believe though how bad that tornado in long grove was. Most certainly looks like ef4. Showtime2009 ( talk) 10:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
<rant>Man, Wikipedia gets crucified for reporting someone's death incorrectly for 5 minutes, and ABC news, 12 hours later, is still reporting an incorrect death toll for Lone Grove. Shows how bad the double standard is...</rant>- Running On Brains 01:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I do not understand why it is so significant to write about five EF0 tornadoes that occurred in rural areas and caused little to no damage. Showtime2009 ( talk) 22:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I know it is still early (we still have to see what tonight's activity does and if tomorrow sees destabilization), but should a tornado outbreak develop tomorrow, how to treat it here is nasty. The biggest problem is that the winter side could very well warrant an article itself. If BOTH sides are article-worthy (a rare event indeed), how should it be treated on Wikipedia? CrazyC83 ( talk) 23:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I'm currently working on an article for this event in a sandbox located here. Feel free to help out with the article. Cyclone biskit 23:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I've added the section but the death toll of 20 sounds preliminary right now so it could be much higher. JForget 17:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I just saw on the ESWD that there was a possible F2 or F3 tornado which killed four people in Nizip, Gaziantep Province. I'll see what I can find on google for more info on this. Cyclone biskit 17:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
I haven't seen any articles started yet, so I will start up a draft page, considering today could be as bad as yesterday. It will likely be article worthy later as it will likely hit at least 25 tornadoes with at least a fatal tornado. See: User:JForget/2009 April tornado outbreak (will be up within the hour). -- JForget 14:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I say we give it a couple hours to see additional development, but if trends continue, publish at 2009 Easter weekend tornado outbreak by 20Z. CrazyC83 ( talk) 18:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
NWS Nashville (at least) is calling it the Good Friday outbreak (and I created a redirect using the name 2009 Good Friday tornado outbreak as a result), but that is not appropriate for the article name due to Thursday's activity (too much happened then to give Friday the main name). CrazyC83 ( talk) 16:32, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering if these were missed or not proven http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/090413_rpts.html http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/090414_rpts.html
Graafsan ( talk) 13:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
HIGH RISK now issued. If that verifies, we'd need to make some article name changes. This event would go to Late-April 2009 tornado outbreak (unless a major city/area gets hit hard that a placename is appropriate). But that really complicates where to move the April 9-10 outbreak article. It would be easy if it weren't for the activity on the night of April 9 (making Good Friday - used by other sites - not the most appropriate name). CrazyC83 ( talk) 16:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like it was actually 4 separate tornado touchdowns in that area, looking at the distance between each touchdown, there is enough distance between them that it should be marked as 4 different tornadoes. According to NWS Huntsville, the map also proves that. So I will add the three other tornadoes in the other article. Also there is no more mention of the fatality, but it would probably be in one of the two Morgan EF0, probably the first EF0 fatality in quite a while. JForget 17:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I know it's not necessarily a significant tornado event, but the derecho event from Dallas to currently Montgomery/Birmingham (to perhaps Atlanta?) might be article worthy. Lots of major wind damage in Louisiana this morning including according to NWS Shreveport that the town of Dodson, Louisiana was completely destroyed. [2] JForget 19:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Shreveport estimated winds of 110 mph in their area from the derecho. CrazyC83 ( talk) 20:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Yet another derecho underway (2 PDS severe watches!). Is this May or July? Anyway that may also be article-worthy especially if it holds up to St. Louis or Memphis. CrazyC83 ( talk) 12:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I really thinks this deserves mention on the page. There was a massive waterspout off the coast of North Island in New Zealand on May 11. It was produced by a slow moving, and extremely powerful supercell thunderstorm which produced 1,500 lightning strikes per hour and hail which accumulated to 10cm after the storm finally died down. Many news reports are saying that something like this has never been seen. Since it was only a waterspout, but some estimates say it could have easily been an F3 over land, I'm discussing it here. Cyclone biskit 20:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Around 2:00 PM EST, over Western Virginia, folks including me got the news: there was a severe thunderstorm warning in effect. Then, a couple seconds later, there was a tornado warning in effect, and lots more followed, and I watched in fear and learned this about the storm: it was over Rocky Mount when strong spinning winds were discovered by the Doppler Radar by the Weather Channel Center in Blacksburg, VA. That was when the tornado warnings became in effect for the region of Virginia, including me. Then the tornado touched down, and caused damage. The storm moved to Pittsylvania County and caused power outages there. Flash Flood Warnings, Flash Flood Watches, Severe Thunderstorm Warnings, Severe Thunderstorm Watches, Tornado Warnings, & Tornado Watches were broadcast altogether for a lot of counties. At around 5:00 PM EST, I checked the weather on my other computer back at home(the one I'm not typing on), and there was Flood Watches & Statements for most of Virginia and Northern North Carolina except for the very western county of the Appalachian Plateau region, & The western 2 of the Ridge & Valley region. And there it was: the Tornado Watch Box, over Southern Central VA, Southeastern VA, & North NC. Could a Weather Channel official who has an account on Wikipedia maybe post the details of today's supercell? -- Sneaky Oviraptor18 talk edits tribute 22:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
there was a torndso on the groung. It was bg —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoduloMan ( talk • contribs) 18:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
The name is VORTEX2 not VORTEX 2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoduloMan ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Why was it removed? - All Tornados need to be added in this article IMO. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Generally, any modest outbreaks, anything of F2/EF2 or stronger (although there are some not mentioned, they all are warranted if someone adds them), hits a well-populated area, is historically notable (i.e. first/last of a year, rare location) or has significant media attention is warranted here. Recently, the pattern has favored a lot of tornadoes, but few have been strong or notable so only a few have been worthy of mention. CrazyC83 ( talk) 00:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
With significant tornadic activity yesterday and a moderate risk for both today and tomorrow (with mentions of "significant tornadoes"), an article may become warranted eventually. Any other thoughts? Finding a start point is difficult due to the consistent (mostly weak) activity the last week, so it will likely become a case of looking at weather maps. CrazyC83 ( talk) 13:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
At this point, I agree that they should be combined, knowing the average (final totals) of the last 10 years is about 90 tornadoes in each month. A hyperactive July or August would warrant splitting. While June has about 100 tornadoes at this point, it surely will be much higher (there were 294 reported, so probably a lot of open-country EF0's will be added to the final total) so that definitely should stay separate. CrazyC83 ( talk) 00:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Since there was a possibility of a tornado in Westchester County, New York late last night. Pending on the NWS I'm probably going to make an article on it like I did for the one in 2006. This one might be more significant as it tracked through a more populated city than the one three years ago. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 14:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like according to a bulletin by the NWS, a tornado was reported (or near) downtown Minneapolis with a church being damaged. Not sure about about damage, although maybe more details will come soon. JForget 19:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Is an article warranted on this event? Downtown tornado, strong EF3, a fatality and quite high tornado total... CrazyC83 ( talk) 01:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Low pressure was moving into Minnesota from the west southwest on Wednesday, August 19. This low began to deepen rapidly in the late morning and especially the afternoon as it moved northeast over the Twin Cities metro area. After a morning and early afternoon of primarily rain across the Twin Cities on Wednesday, embedded circulations developed within the shower activity by 2 pm. These circulations were moving quickly north and many were not associated with thunderstorms. There were only a handful of cloud-to-ground lightning strikes all afternoon in the areas where damage was reported. The circulations formed due to strong atmospheric wind speeds which were turning in the lower portion of the atmosphere. While there was little instability, or what meteorologists look for to know that air can rise and form thunderstorms, there was enough rising air to stretch these circulations at times and form likely short-lived tornadoes.
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=mpx&storyid=30471&source=0
WxGopher ( talk) 06:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I know September is not normally an active month unless the tropics are active, but this could be the first time since these annual projects were started that the entire month went without any even semi-notable tornado events and with an empty monthly section. (January came close) With only 3 tornadoes confirmed so far with a week left in September, we have to go back to January 2004 (2 tornadoes) to find a month with so few tornadoes. CrazyC83 ( talk) 14:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 15 external links on
Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on
Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on
Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tornadoes of 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Should the be an article for the event? Tornado outbreaks like that usually only occur in Canada and the United States. Also, it produced 2 EF4 tornadoes, which is rare for South America. Futuremeterologist ( talk) 02:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)