This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
A fact from Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that in the judgement in Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia on voters' rights for the disabled in a referendum on gay marriage, the
European Court of Human Rights for the first time extended its jurisdiction to referendums? Source: The court ruled today (26 October) that Slovenia had discriminated against two wheelchair users with muscular dystrophy in a 2015 referendum on gay marriage, because the country’s courts had not allowed them to request accessible polling places ahead of the vote./This case was the first in which the ECHR extended its jurisdiction to referendums
https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/top-stories/2021/10-october/echr-ruling-has-europe-wide-implications-on-disability
ALT2: ... that in Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia, initiated by two disabled voters who said they were discriminated against in a referendum on gay marriage, the
European Court of Human Rights extended its jurisdiction to referenda?
Right at 200 characters and has both elements that you'd like to keep. Others are possible but tricky to figure out. Referendums/referenda are interchangeable.
Urve (
talk)
12:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks PC. Please note that I have verified all aspects of this nomination, but can't verify ALT4 as I supplied it, so we just need somebody to verify ALT4, thanks,
Gatoclass (
talk)
09:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The ALT4 is really good except for the phrase "access rights". Access rights does not mean anything. I suggest replacing the access rights with a different phrase. This text would be accurate:
Since the proposed alt is no longer mine, I can now complete this review. Article is new and long enough, neutrally written and passed a
WP:PARAPHRASE check. The hook is cited and interesting, the only issue being that it is slightly over the 200 char limit at 201 chars, but given the difficulty we have had in getting it under the limit I don't think it possible to do any better. The important thing is that the hook doesn't read as excessively long. QPQ is done, nomination verified.
Gatoclass (
talk)
02:34, 21 November 2021 (UTC)reply