Tomb of Safdar Jang has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 25, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Tomb of Safdar Jang appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 August 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) ( talk · contribs) 23:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
-- Tomandjerry211 (alt) ( talk) 23:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
-- Tomandjerry211 (alt) ( talk) 10:43, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Tomandjerry211 (alt) Done. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি ( talk) 08:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The Sharma citation has a serious error. It says that the garden has an area of 2,952 sq ft, i.e., not much bigger than my little urban garden. The Batra reference states "The tomb is set in the middle of a large walled square garden, each side measuring around 280 metres.", so the external area is about 78,400 square metres, over 843,890 square feet, or about 285 times the size here in wikipedia. When the article states that this is a scaled-down type of architecture, a reader could become very confused. It is clear from the images, that this is not the tiny garden with a tomb somehow squeezed into it that Sharma claims it is. Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 14:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
anomalies in the article; weird GA pass. ∯WBG converse 14:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)