This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
I found sufficient references (six total), including one from the BBC and one from a university press book (on the concept of the sonnets being addressed to a male, very possibly Willy Hughes, as referenced in this play), which establish enough notability for me to contest the prod nomination. There is more, but that's all I had time for right now. Prod tag removed. —
Becksguy02:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to Sexuality of William Shakespeare
This is just a stub as it is. There seem to be sufficient sources to add enough context to make it a decent section in
Sexuality of William Shakespeare, but I'm not sure it should be a stand alone article. Didn't spend enough time searching for sources, so I may be wrong. If no one objects, I will merge it (or some one else can). Any discussion on this? I added a merge tag. —
Becksguy02:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Article should be developed conforming to WP plays/theater constructs. Merging into either of the other articles will lose most of what would be here and would seem to be a sentence in either
Sexuality of William Shakespeare or
William Hughes (Mr. W. H.). I'm hardly a Shakespeare fan but I wonder if there are numerous plays written in response or tribute and this might be a part of that tradition.
Benjiboi01:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply