![]() | Titan Quest has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 29, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
Age of Empires co-creator Brian Sullivan and features ragdoll physics, full lighting effects, day-night cycles, ancient world mythology, modern 3D graphics, unique treasures, fast gameplay, and a world editor for players to rapidly create their own custom worlds, mods, and quests.
Oh and btw, even if it gets fix'd (I'll try but sometimes my contributions get deleted ¬¬) "unique treasures" "fast gameplay" and "full lightning effects" sound like a very vague description/adversiment buzzwords. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.210.55.149 ( talk) 15:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Oops, I deleted something I think I shouldn't have... or does everything get checked first before editing? o.O Guess I'll find out O_O —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
24.184.119.40 (
talk •
contribs) .
Quote: The game has a unique loot system. Monsters can only drop items that they were using. After the player kills the monster, the player can then pick up the monster's items.
I call BS.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.235.59.31 ( talk • contribs) .
The system requirements for the game - 1.8 ghz is the Intel requirement, as it says on the website, an AMD equivelent can be used (NOT 1.8 ghz) such as a 1.6ghz Athlon XP. -- Notmyhandle 07:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
THQ has announced an expansion pack for Titan Quest, which will be called "Titan Quest: Immortal Throne"
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061115/law038a.html http://titanquestvault.ign.com/screenshots/?category_select_id=cat_9
Benfea 02:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The Immortal Throne Expansion section has several errors, such as typos on "zues" and "charcter", but the main issue is that, at the beginning of the article, Immortal Throne was listed as released in July 2007, but this section lists it as March 2007. I will paste the original article below: "THQ released Titan Quest: Immortal Throne as an expansion pack in March 2007. it features the continue of the story, where zues sends the charcter to the underworld, where the character must fight his way to kill hades." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.153.136 ( talk) 01:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I tagged the article as unreferenced, although frankly I'd have preferred to label it for "reference cleanup". The article does have some external links at the end, some of which can presumably be used as citations. That's great. The problem is that there are no in-line citations for individual paragraphs or sentences, so it's difficult to tell which facts in the article are supported by the provided external links and which aren't.
The article will therefore need a reference cleanup to place in-line footnote citation tags to label which source is being used for which piece of information. See WP:CITE#HOW for more information on using reference tags. Dugwiki 22:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Why does this article list all of the NEW classes on the expansion quest, but it doesn't even list ANY of the old ones? Those would be better to either just be left on the expansion page, or the normal classes put on this page, don't you think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.60.195.11 ( talk) 19:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
Just FYI, for incorporation here or anywhere else: The game may fail to load with the latest patch with the message "Virtual memory must be enabled to run Titan Quest". One workaround for this is to increase the page file size (Control panel -> System -> Advanced -> Settings (under Performance) -> Advanced (tab) -> Change) to 2x the physical memory you have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.48.202 ( talk) 15:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Where's the mention to Diablo 2? This game is an extremely well done copy of Diablo! Why Diablo is mentioned in games like Silverfall or Revenant and this game not?
Please fix this, Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stahn ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
On the one hand, I don't think this should have any references to other games, so it's good as it is. On the other hand, there is a lack of detail in quite a few things, such as gameplay, class system, and overall developement. The part that describes the gameplay seems to be straight out of an ad, and is still lacking, much like the entire article. Either someone should flesh it out, or people should take out all the same information provided in all the other game articles on Wikipedia. Equality and all that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Durmgrid ( talk • contribs) 06:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this page should have something on piracy. Iron Lore apparently shut down due to the rampant piracy of this game. Sorry, I'm a nub with Wiki editing. http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=42663 http://www.gamefront.com/thq-ceo-blames-piracy-for-close-of-titan-quest-developer/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.86.49 ( talk) 21:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
There's no reason that Titan Quest: Immortal Throne should have a separate article. It's not even a separate game, just an expansion, and the article has no reliable sources for any of its information or to establish enough notability for a separate article. DreamGuy ( talk) 06:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Judgesurreal777 ( talk · contribs) 14:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Alrighty, I shall take this article for review. I will start working on the review itself soon. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 14:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | *LEAD:
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Formatted well, though the introduction should probably be reformatted into three paragraphs.
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Everything is laid out beautifully and properly per Wikipedia guidelines and norms. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All the links are operative per Checklinks. As for reference check, are Game Banshee, Droid Gamers and Bloggers Reliable Sources?
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | The categories look good, but is the game still "Windows only" since its iOS release? Also, shouldn't it get labeled "iOS game" and Android game in the category section? Also, I checked five references in different sections to spot check and make sure content was reliably sourced and it was.
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No copyright infringement that the detector can find, and the one match was a quote in quotations. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | All information is within the scope of the topic. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article appropriately sized, no need for merger or sub-articles. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Article shows no bias. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Very stable, no arguing or disputes present. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The second and third images are well tagged and have good rationales. The first image, however, is a mess on the image page with several tags that need to get fixed and a bare bones rationale.
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The gameplay caption doesn't make sense even as a fragment, make it longer if you have to, but definitely make it clearer.
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Great job! The article could use some more prose work, but it is really good now, so great job! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |