This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all
COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to
join and to participate in
project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
As we've already done it for March, should we do the same thing for April right now or wait until references start not displaying correctly? --
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝)
22:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Seeing as no action has been taken in a week, I'm assuming we're leaving this page as is until reference overabundance happens again. --
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝)
06:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Will be a good idea to split into separate pandemic and response sections. Will just have to copy and paste the Al Jazeera and other news references I have been using. Will be good to do it before the references start playing up.
Andykatib02:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
It's been sorted into the WHO's Six Continent model. Probably no good reason to retrofit the previous monthly timelines from the PHEIC onwards, but I think this shift beginning in April is salient.
kencf0618 (
talk)
11:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Greetings and felicitations. "COVID" or "Covid"? Ignoring the use in references, "Covid" seems to be the more used, but "COVID" is what is used for the
Wikipedia article (and as an acronym is supported by the
MOS, as well as being my personal preference). Should I clean this up (only in the article text, I mean, not the references) or leave it alone? —
DocWatson42 (
talk)
08:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Tenryuu: Thank you. That seems on point for me to clean up the body of the article (to be clear: not the references), changing all instances of "Covid" to "COVID". Further comments? —
DocWatson42 (
talk)
13:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Someone get to it before me, so there were only two instances left to correct. I also cleaned up the
MOS:LAYOUT, deleted link cruft, and corrected a few instances of a name in references. Thank you for collaborating. ^_^ —
DocWatson42 (
talk)
03:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply