From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
The main criteria it fails is sourcing/verfiability. Currently has a lot of broken links, i noted this on talk page a little while ago - have tried to fix but more difficult than normal as the sites originally used seem to be discontinued. Article also has style tag.
Tom B (
talk )
16:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
This article has a number of issues as noted above. Specifically as listed below. ––
Jezhotwells (
talk )
23:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
reply
I shall be assessing this article against the
Good Article
criteria , following its
nomination for reassessment.
Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see
here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (
MoS ) :
Contains too much un-encyclopaedic information. Needs to be completely rewritten in a neutral encyclopaedic style.
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) :
Seven dead links have been tagged for some time.
ref #2
[1] , what makes this a
reliable source ?
- Replaced
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #6
[2] is a forum , not RS
- Replaced
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #7
[3] is a wordpess blog, not an RS
- replaced
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #8
[4] is a tripod.com site, not RS
- replaced
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #9
[5] bebo is not an RS
- removed
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:49, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #11
[6] , what makes this a reliable source?
- removed
ASOTMKX (
talk )
06:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #12
[7] , what makes this a reliable source?
- removed
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #14
[8] , no information supporting statement
- removed
ASOTMKX (
talk )
05:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
ref #28
[9] Google Answers is not an RS
- removed
ASOTMKX (
talk )
06:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
In fact very few of the references here are RS, so I will delist immediately
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
Too much minutiae
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
Article contains a large amount of fancruft, no critical reception
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
What encyclopaedic content is aded by
File:Tiesto at london 02 arena.jpg and
File:Olympic flame at opening ceremony.jpg ?
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Quickfail on grounds of a large number of unreliable sources. Note also the outstanding fancruft tag, which has not been addressed. ––
Jezhotwells (
talk )
00:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
reply