This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Freud did call it Oedipus complex by 1905, actually he'd used the term as far back as 1897 in a letter to Wilhelm Fließ, on both facts see
http://nyfreudian.org/abstracts_00.html. --
TlatoSMD, 05:28, 21 May 2006 (CEST)
I don't see anything at that link that I see which says this. From what I understand he called it something else; the "complex" part was named by Jung. --
Fastfission20:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)reply
It seems to be working now. My mistake. I have recieved an error 403 (Forbidden). After a few minutes it became 503 (Service unavailable). Restored ;)
Aneurysmal20:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I think it would be helpful for someone to comment on why this article is vital to Wikipedia's coverage of Art. A next step might be to identify some of the best sources in that connection. This research is obviously relevant:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381499/ It deals with iconography in a pretty straightforward, historical way. Freud's book seems to be frequently cited in the literature on Surrealism, and sometimes on Modern art in general. What else is out there to document specifics? What do art researchers need to know about the book? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
173.17.178.22 (
talk)
01:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)reply