![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yeah, I took the other article and incorporated it into this one. Ericl ( talk) 16:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello all,
Today I've completed a reference audit for this article since this guy could end up impeached. In the process, I've removed these statements from 'Federal Judge' section:
Porteous is well-known for his stance upholding the Constitutional separation of church and state and his judgments in defense of the First Amendment right to free speech.
and
He said there was ample evidence that many of the groups participating in the Governor's Program on Abstinence were "furthering religious objectives."
For the first one, it seems POV. If one were a conservative type of fellow, one could make an opposite statement. As for the second one, I could find no refs for it. If anyone here finds any, re-add it. Hope this helps. - Thanks, Hos hie 01:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Thomas Porteous. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The Present photo is pixelated and out of focus, there are better photos of the man available, could we use those instead? 50.82.56.112 ( talk) 05:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)