![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 20, 2021 and November 20, 2022. |
Is there any truth to the rumour that there is to be a Thomas Chatterton statue placed nearby his London flat? If so, please advise, I'd like to do further research. thankyou JerricaB ( talk) 10:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Article says:
Given the first sentence, I wonder what the 'others' could be. Perhaps the comma parenthesis in the first sentence is incorrect. William Avery 09:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure where the revisions should begin as this article seems to have been copied largely from the Encyclopedia Brittanica. Maxdwolf ( talk) 21:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
It is hard to believe that the author of this article has actually looked at any of Chatterton's poems. The fraudulent medievalism worked because, as the author notes too briefly, 18th-century readers had no knowledge of much before Shakespeare. But simply as poems, they are often awkward, prosy and dull. Josephlestrange ( talk) 14:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Do we need the enigmatic lines of M. Gainsbourg to help us to an understanding of this brilliant wayward talent ? In my opinion: no, we don't ( Pamour ( talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)).
In November User:Bellerophon5685 added a banner saying the neutrality of this article is disputed. Can we discuss the problem and identify what can be done to resolve it?— Rod talk 10:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
To me the article seemed like it was written, in the parlance of our times, by a fanboy. It seems a little too liberal in its praise of Chattertons genius. Or at least it did when I added the banner.-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 20:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
BTW, how do I link to the wikionary entry for "abstimeous"-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 21:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thomas Chatterton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)