This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Well, the band recently said at their latter show dates that they would be returning in 2011. It all seems off to me. Why announce when you'll be back? Why make such a big deal about the "announcement" and not tell the fans then?
Golla backing vocalist?
To the person who keeps listing Mike Golla as a backing vocalist: Look, first off, I see you are a fairly unexperieced user. Please take a look at
WP:MOS, as you are making a lot of style mistakes, not just in this article. Also, stop spamming the article with your comments trying to prove me wrong. They don't belong there at all. I read the edit history, so posting your comments there suffices.
Anyway, Golla is not credited in any of the band's booklets as a backing vocalist, as he does not perform vocals on any of their releases. In their videos, just like on the records (as those are the same recordings), Kenny Vasoli performs the backing vocals. Golla may lipsync to several lines, which is commonly done in music videos, just for the sake of giving it a more genuine feel.
HarryCane17:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)reply
There is a dispute going on about what non-album tracks should or should not be listed. The songs in question are "Lasting Impressions (Full Band Version)," "Song For Her," and "The Rain Cloud And I." These songs were recorded for "Based on a True Story" but were cut when the album was released. They have since been released by the Starting Line on their MySpace and PureVolume web pages. Does anyone else have an opinion on this?
User:12.5.1.20714:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)reply
As I already pointed out, I think they shouldn't be listed for various reasons. First off, the Non-album tracks section usually only lists released tracks that were not on one of a band's albums (see
New Found Glory,
Dashboard Confessional,
Hidden in Plain View,
Fenix*TX,
Something Corporate, the list goes on and on). All these articles only list songs that were either on compilations, available for online purchase or on import versions of the albums. Also, while "Song for Her" was in fact recorded with With Hopes of Starting Over, the other songs in question were only demos ("The Rain Cloud and I", "Lasting Impressions" — which was already released on The Make Yourself at Home EP) that the band recorded in pre-production for their album Based on a True Story, not in the actual recording session with Tim O'Heir. They also posted a demo version of "Cheek to Cheek". Shouldn't that one be listed as well? Or the live version of "The Best of Me" from the Drive-Thru Invasion Compilation? Or all the other demos from the We the People Sessions? If you're going to start listing unreleased songs and different versions of album tracks, you'll never hear the end of it. --
HarryCane18:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I'll never hear the end of it from you. Fine, I'll agree with you that all the different versions of songs shouldn't be listed and therefore "Lasting Impressions" shouldn't be there. However, "Song For Her" and "The Rain Cloud and I" are different songs that are 1) not on any album, 2) released by the band, and 3) "available for online purchase" (in this case, free streaming). And why can't we put the We the People sessions on here and just say it features demos of starting line songs? What would be so wrong with that? Check out
Sum 41,
Yellowcard,
Something Corporate to see where people list unreleased stuff. --
User:12.5.1.20715:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)reply
First off, how is free streaming a form of online purchase? Also, the only "unreleased" songs that the
Something Corporate discography lists are The Galaxy Sessions (if you had looked into it you even would have noticed that I created that article and put it there). These were, however, not unreleased demos, but a properly produced recording distributed to members of their street team. Other songs (like "Rock & Roll Band" and "If I Were a Terrorist") are not listed, for a good reason. And I never said the We the People Sessions shouldn't be included in the aritcle (as advance copies of them exist). I said it would be stupid to list every single track in the "Non-album tracks" section. If it's done in a similar manner to the Galaxy Sessions and if someone can supply sufficient information, there would IMO be absolutely nothing wrong with that.
As for
Yellowcard (an article that is generally in an exceptionally bad shape), the "Other Songs" (which BTW shouldn't be capatilized) section was recently added by unexperienced users and anons, and is seeded with incorrect information anyways (e.g. "Hey Mike" was first released on the "Way Away" UK single, it lists songs that were performed live or on TV/radio once, and what "exclusive track from Lights and Sounds" is supposed to mean I don't know).
Sum 41 lists one unreleased track, that's true. But as I pointed out earlier, there are tons of articles that don't. "Song for Her" and "The Rain Cloud and I" were never officially released and listing them in the appropriate album pages (With Hopes of Starting Over and Based on a True Story) suffices. --
HarryCane12:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
I think that this is an article about The Starting line, and they have a ton of unreleased/releases online/B-Side material. If not here, then where do we list it? I have songs like Gainsay, Birch Hill, Drawbacks, Forever in a Day, Hold On, Left Coast Envy (demo), Nothing Short of a Miracle, Thanks, You're the Best, Thirty, and West Girl Scout Road. I was so happy to find the few non album tracks there were and finally find out where they came from. I was disappointed to see that the others that I have are not listed and some people will never know they existed. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
69.202.123.76 (
talk)
02:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC).reply
There is an EP called the starting line that I ripped from a friend of mine who worked at drive thrurecords. It included 3 tracks, 1. Given the Chance (same as say it like you mean it), 2. Best of Me (same as say it like you mean it), and 3. Thanks, You're the Best (Previously Unreleased). I'm pretty sure that this is the only album to have featured Thanks, You're the best. I remember the album being a thin jewel cd case, maybee some kind of burgundy boarder, and the cover was the starting line logo inside that rectangle and a photo of the guys in street clothes. If anyone knows any more, I'd like to get enough info to add it. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
69.202.123.76 (
talk)
04:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC).reply
Most of the songs you listed were Sunday Drive songs (songs that were written and recorded before the band became The Starting Line). If they were to be mentioned (which they shouldn't because they were a. never officially released, and b. not by The Starting Line), I think the only appropriate way would be to list the 3 songs from Sunday Drive's only release (the split CD mentioned in the article) in a seperate article. The sampler you're mentioning is already in the article, and since it was really only a promo thing, it doesn't warrant its own article. What could be considered to be "outsourced" are the We the People Sessions, in a similar manner to Something Corporate's The Galaxy Sessions. I think that's the most perfect solution, so feel free to add that. --
HarryCane16:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Rock music
Why does the make yourself at home EP, need to say rock? I mean, it is an acoustic CD, so rock can be replaced with either Acoustic or acoustic rock. While the music containts both pop punk and acoustic rock, there is nothing to suggest rock itself. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
82.38.71.76 (
talk)
17:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC).reply
First of all, I'm glad that you decided to take part in a discussion, rather than continuing the ongoing edit war, so thank you for that. As for the genre, it's common usage to first list the general genre a band/album/EP falls under (in this instance
rock), then to list explanatory styles (
acoustic rock,
pop punk,
post-harcorde,
ska punk, etc.) since rock is such a wide genre. Same with
hip-hop or
pop, which just as well can be further subcategorized, but should nonetheless be listed where applicable, to give a general idea to readers who might not be familiar with the listed styles and subgenres. --
HarryCane13:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
The Starting Line. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.