![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The Smurfs Movie Will be in 2010, Fix It! Benzy19 17:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
He's right. The teaser poster came out, and they said Holidays, 2010. It looks pretty good! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.244.68 ( talk) 23:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The Smurfs Movie is now scheduled to be released on August 3, 2011, according to ComingSoon.net. I restored the new date. -- 68.191.69.187 ( talk) 22:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Some clarification is needed. Is the movie 'in production' or pre-production? Second paragraph:
Production began in 2003. In June 2008, it was announced that Columbia Pictures had acquired film rights from Lafig Belgium (after Paramount's option expired). The Smurfs is currently in pre-production stage.
-- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 13:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
"Since it's also a blue moon, a magical portal within the grotto transports them into present-day Central Park in New York, by the magic ring where Gargamel wearing it's powers." What language is this supposed to be? -- Imladros ( talk) 04:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Who voices Framer Smurf in this movie? Wierse ( talk) 17:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Why is the box office gross in the info box displayed like this (Ex: $253.7 million) instead of the full number? This is the only film entry that I have seen on Wikipedia in over 2 years of monitoring film articles that the film gross is displayed like this? Why the special occasion? ~ Jedi94 ( talk) 14:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Some IPs have been adding a reference to WordGirl,, which is "A May I Have a Word? contestant Emily and her brother Eli gaves the film a "two thumbs down". Per WP:BRD, I am opening this discussions to see if others can get voice their opinions on tho matter, rather than edit warring. Is an animated TV series that contain cameos, such as WordGirl, considered a reliable source for reception by WIkipedia standards? Darth Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 13:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:GiantSmurfComic-Con.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:14, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Frankly speaking, I was deeply shocked by this smurfs' movie, especially by Mr.Hank Azaria's outstanding performance. This story happened in the Big Apple, but what I think is that the story would be more sensational if it were to happen in Brusseils,the capital of Belgium. Considering the fact that Gargamel want to catch the smurfs for making gold,maybe their story will be connected with the current European Debt Crisis......
I think it's interesting that the movie demonstrated a copyright violation on Wikipedia material, as Patrick rips off the image from the blue moon article to create the logo for the Anjelou Cosmetics firm. Don't you think this is worth mentioning? צחי ( talk) 20:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Apparently, there is some dispute about the main credits as shown in the billing block. This poster shows Hank Azaria, Neil Patrick Harris, Jayma Mays and Sofia Vergara.
Koala15 added 7 additional names on December 10. I'm not sure why. Based on the rather emphatic edit summary removing them here, an IP editor seems to feel pretty strongly about it.
Can anyone offer some clarification? - SummerPhD v2.0 03:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
BBFC, iTunes, Amazon and IMDb show 102 or 103 minutes for runtime. AFI shows 86 minutes for runtime. AFI is most likely wrong. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 02:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Right now, the live-action Smurfs is considered to have "mixed-to negative reviews" with a Tomatometer of 21% and a Metascore of 30. Meanwhile, the Wikipedia page for Batman v Superman says that it earned "generally unfavorable reviews", despite having a higher Tomatometer and Metascore. This made me wonder: what is the process for how Wikipedia determines how to describe a movie's critical reception? Because I've seen movies that barely break 30% on the Tomatometer (and have Metascores in the 30s or 40s) that are described as having "mixed" receptions, while other films with the same score are described as receiving "generally negative reviews". How do authors on Wikipedia decide how to describe a film's critical reception; like, what is the line between a "mixed" critical reception and an "unfavorable" one, for instance? DBeyer2003 ( talk) 03:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
The Smurfs '11 is a comic book limited series published by Papercutz that was served as a continuation of The Smurfs (2011) and The Smurfs 2 (2013), in which starring the Smurfs. 2001:48F8:300B:3DB:7144:88E5:B462:C7DE ( talk) 22:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)