This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Sinking of the Lusitania article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Sinking of the Lusitania is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 7, 2015. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 9, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that cartoonist
Winsor McCay (pictured) created comic strips and animation about
explosive sneezes and
exploding mosquitoes, the dreams
of children and
of adults, a
dancing dinosaur, and
the World War I torpedoing of the RMS Lusitania? |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article says that the film is twelve minutes long, but the embedded video is 9:37. Was the film perhaps damaged over the years? Calmansi ( talk) 15:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Moving Picture World for May 11, 1918 claims "Winsor MacKay's 'The Sinking of the Lusitania'" had been recently shown at the Strand, where "A soldier's quartet rendered patriotic songs and the Symphony Orchestra played 'Pomp and Circumstance.'" How is this possible if the film was not released until July 20 (according to Canemaker), or August 15 (according to Theisen)? Curly Turkey ( gobble) 13:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
One of the great tragedies of a western/english speaking education is America and her allies in WW1 are portrayed as the "heroes and saviors" and that Imperial Germany was equivalent to, if not directly linked, to Nazi Germany.
Of course, neither of these are true. Sadly this article would have you believe the above opinion to be true. This is because this article is neither of good quality nor deserving of the "featured" status. Is is poorly written, biased, and only half-true.
Throughout the article words like "tragedy" are used to portray the event as the evil krauts killing a ship full or orphans or something. In reality, the ship was packed with millions of rounds of munitions intended for Britain, and was specifically loaded into the Lusitania to protect the stores from reaching their destination.
Winston Churchill himself personally instructed as many "neutral" or "civilian" ships as possible to carry arms, because when the Germans sank them Britain would be able to claim it was a "massacre" and not a simple event in a war.
In short, this article is a propaganda article about a propaganda article and I hope to fix that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.89.209 ( talk) 00:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Addressed to the first responce: Your sarcasm and aloof smugness is quite helpful and I hope you'll continue to use it.
Addressed to the second: Of course, but that must be acknowledged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.89.209 ( talk) 04:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)