"It functions mainly as a parody of the television show Mad Men, in which the guest voices John Slattery and Matthew Weiner are an actor and the creator respectively. " I don't think this quite says what you mean it to say
"Critics found the episode to be mediocre. It was neither bad nor great, but the episode did receive criticism for wasted opportunities with the Mad Men parody." "Neither bad nor great" is not very encyclopedic (also make clear this is critics' opinions)
"When the bullies watches him reading a classic novel at school, the bullies force him to read Little Women to them." Don't like the repetition of "bullies" here
Based on the reviews you provided, I wouldn't call the episode mediocre. Maybe say there were mixed reviews? Or something similar?
I was a bit unsure on the wording. I use the word "mixed" when the critics disagree, but here they almost all agreed that it was an episode that was nothing spectacular and yet not terrible either. Do you have any better suggestions? Otherwise I will just use "mixed" as we write in almost all episode articles.--
Maitch (
talk)
16:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes, I found that as well, but I can't really find anything useful. Hank Azaria was shooting a now cancelled show next to Mad Men and plays cards with Jon Hamm, who does not appear in the episode. Have I missed something? --
Maitch (
talk)
21:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)reply
While I wrote a long list, each individual issue really isn't very difficult to resolve. I'll place the review on hold for seven days with this in mind. Thanks, Ruby2010/201318:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Hi. Thanks for the review. I will try and fix these issues. However, since the holidays are coming up, I probably won't be able to respond as fast as usual. --
Maitch (
talk)
16:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)reply