This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
I've come up with a few things that I think should be fixed-up before I promote the article:
"follows the events of" is a little tricky in terms of wording, as it can also sometimes be used when talking about what events a work covers. I would prefer something more like "is set after".
I think the reception summary in the lead should come after the announcement and release info. You could even swap their places, so the announcement and release stuff finished the second paragraph and the release info becomes its own third paragraph.
"helped eased" -> "helped ease" or "eased"
I think the sentence about positive feedback to the show in the second production paragraph should be in the first, before the announcement of the comic.
I also think that the artist info from the first production paragraph could be moved down to the third one, to be with the other info on Koh.
Make sure that all internet sources have been archived.
@
Adamstom.97: Thanks for the review. I think I've addressed your first 5 points, do have a look and let me know if there are any more issues. On the final point, I've archived all the internet sources. Do you mean you'd like me to add the archiveurls and dates to the citations as well?
Bennv3771 (
talk)
03:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Yes, just so future readers can get to them if something is taken down at any point. I also think it's just good practice, to be safe. All of the other points look good. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
05:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)reply
No, that all looks good to me. I am going to pass this review. Congratulations! This article is very good, and definitely meets all the criteria. Good work on making all those changes so quickly as well. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
22:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Removal of LGBT Content
I reverted a bunch of recent edits that removed significant LGBT content from the article. I also provided a new reference to address the editor's reasons for removal.
Web Warlock (
talk)
23:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)reply