This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Harushiga (
talk ·contribs) previously reverted my first attempt at removing them by saying that is common in anime articles to do such a thing. The
MOS:ANIME says "The character section should consist of brief character outlines, as opposed to a simple list. The length of each entry and inclusion of characters will vary with the character's
importance to the story." and says nothing on romanji.
I've removed them a second time because I still don't see how romanji for non-Japanese character names (which is basically every one of the series's characters) adds anything here besides bloat. Unless somebody can point out a guideline I missed, then I'm going to assume it was only added because
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. ~
Dissident93(
talk)14:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)reply
It is indeed very common to include Japanese spellings and romanizations thereof for character names in anime articles, but I agree that it's not that useful here, as they're just phonetic
katakanizations of non-Japanese names.
MOS:JAPAN gives advice on how to indicate romaji, but doesn't suggest that it should be done, and as you say
MOS:ANIME does no such thing either.--
AlexandraIDV16:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Episode summaries
@
Dissident93: Are these taken from somewhere? Some of this, particularly the trailing off in the one for episode 7, has the cadence of an official episode summary, and when I google the summaries I find that they are also used on other sites. If it is the case that they are taken from other sites, they will need to be removed and the relevant
page revisions deleted for copyright violations. If they actually are original, I apologize for doubting it.
AlexandraIDV16:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)reply
They are taken directly from
Crunchyroll. If this is still viewed as a copyright violation, then feel free to remove them. I haven't watched the series yet (waiting for it to be fully dubbed first) so I wouldn't be able to help much here. Maybe we could just use the
Kiseki wiki as a base? ~
Dissident93(
talk)18:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Yeah, that's considered a copyright violation. It's possible to use the Kiseki Wiki as a base, as the text there is under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, but you will still need to provide attribution (you can find information about this
here).--
AlexandraIDV20:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)reply
only just getting round to watching this and- max only voiced him in episode 5. not really sure whats going on with the returning game dub actors in this game, but that was not max after episode 5 and was some other guy.you can check epi5 an 6 to see this. they didnt even try and have the new guy sound like max which is jarring upon watching epi5 then 6. with rean, altina, lecther, and i hear a few others who show up later like elliot all being recast what did crunchyroll do to piss off the game's cast
Muur (
talk)
19:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)reply