![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
hi @ AGTepper: I restored an edit you made removing the COI tags as it was unclear why it made sense to remove them yet. Can you please share your thinking? I ask the question in good faith. Thank you, WestportWiki ( talk) 00:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
i've changed my mind, you are welcome to add more coi tags or delete the uncited verbiage or the entire article, it's the loss for the rest of the humanity if these ideas go unheard, i've tried my part, it's time to move on : ) -- AGTepper ( talk) 05:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Ronz put the COI back on 04 Dec 2019 speculating likely COI, i mean come on, it's like me putting coi on silly 'start with why' speculating you are getting paid by our dear friend Sinek, haha -- AGTepper ( talk) 06:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
the editor of interest has changed his mind, you are welcome to add more advert tags or delete the uncited verbiage or the entire article, it's the loss for the rest of the humanity if these ideas go unheard, i've tried my part, it's time to move on : ) -- AGTepper ( talk) 00:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Surely there have been some reviews, some critique, some objections to this model by now. Why are they not shown? Fustbariclation ( talk) 16:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)