![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I see that we've started getting articles created for every book (see Category:Hardy Boys). Do we need a very short article on each book? Could we place these plot summaries in the main Hardy Boys article, and make the titles redirect to the sections? Will we ever expand these stubs into useful articles in their own right? Bovlb 16:08, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
I dont see it as a problem. Even if they remain short articles--and I think that many of the earlier books can be expanded because they have changed so much since the original edition was published--it is better than having an enormously long article with 174 subtopics. Danny 16:13, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Geez, I just took all morning setting those pages up, now you want to get rid of them. Thanks a lot! -- FWDixon 18:20, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
To try to sell books thru Amazon.
I didn't mean to disrepect your work, but rather suggest an alternative format. You'll note that I didn't go ahead and just do it, but instead I raised it as a question. Also, the pages were initially created by an anon IP, which made it harder for me to contact you directly. Given the sheer number of books, perhaps one page would be unwieldy, especially if we have more than 200 bytes to say about each one. Bovlb 21:12, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
I think the current format with a separate listing for each title is the way to go. Hopefully more info will be added to each title. As you point out, if all that info was on 1 page it would soon become unwieldy. -- FWDixon 19:18, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sure, so you can have another 58 links to your web site. Get real. This is link spamming and will not be allowed.
Should the synopsis of the Hardy Boys' history be a long, direct quote from this page? Is that acceptable, copyright-wise?
Since I'm the copyright holder for that site I think it's OK :) -- FWDixon 11:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Get real. Everything except the pictures on your site was taken from published books on the Hardys.
Hardy and Hardy Investigations by Tony Carpentieri, 1997, SynSine Press
The Lost Hardys: A Concordance by Robert L. Crawford, SynSine Press
The Bayport Companion by Charles Heffelfinger, self-published
Frank and Joe Turn Blue by Tony Carpentieri, SynSine Pres
Collector's Guide to Hardcover Boys' Series Books by E. Christian Mattson
Need more?
It's known as PLAGIARISM, plain and simple. The research was done by the authors of the reference books listed, NOT YOU. There is NOTHING original on the site.
Please, my site has been up for 10 years and is the product of exhaustive research by myself and others and 100s of hours of work on my part. It was the first web site to bring this information to the cyber-community. Why you childishly remove the links to I'll leave for you to explain here.-- FWDixon 5 July 2005 15:09 (UTC)
Who do you think you are kidding? All of the information was lifted from loads of reference books on the series. You have nearly 100 links to your web pages from Wikipedia. This is an flagrant abuse of the encyclopedia to sell books via Amazon.
See [ [1]] for more discussion on this problem.
Why not create a separate sub-category just for the books? That would allow the articles about the characters to stand out.-- Hooperbloob 6 July 2005 05:29 (UTC)
I think the characters and the books are inseperable and that the current format is the way to go. Many of the characters already have their own pages and I'll be adding more as time allows.-- FWDixon 6 July 2005 10:20 (UTC)
Well I sure hope someone gets this silly dispute settled soon so I can add my site back into the links section, as it appears Bob Finnan (FWDixon) has deleted it from the listings.
By the way, the information on foreign languages at the bottom of the introduction (Sinhala, Afrikaans etc.) came directly from my research. For proof, see my website (www.hardy-boys.com) and an upcoming article (November) in YELLOWBACK LIBRARY, a magazine devoted to series books including the Hardys. As such, I feel that either a direct link to FWDixon's site should be removed, or a link to my site should be added.
- Austin Johnson Webmaster, Hardy-Boys.Com Editor, The Bayport Gazette webzine (bayportgazette.com/bg)
You are a fine one to talk about plagiarism Finnan. Every word on your site was copied from copyrighted books on the Stratemeyer series. Johnson's webzine is outstanding and his web site unlike yours has completely original content.
Yeah, all of it was written and published by others. You are a shameless plagiarist and link spammer.
The problem is FWDixon who sets up 100+ links on Wiki to a web site created from other people's work and that no one has woken up to the fact that these are redundant and are there to sell books thru Amazon from that site.
I see, though, that the protection has remained on the page. Will this be removed so deleted links can be added once again?
Yes and then they will be deleted until the link spamming is stopped.
More on the link spamming and commercial advertising. Example http://hardyboys.bobfinnan.com/hbpb.htm is just a list of titles that all have links to Amazon. All of the books summaries were copied from Amazon. Every HB Digest title, Casefiles title, Clues Brothers title, Supermysteries title, Ultra Thriller title and so on has a link to Amazon and all summaries were copied from Amazon. Does that tell anyone something?
Yep, tells us you're lying! Here's a link to Amazon's Ultra Thriller page ( http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671756613/ref=nosim) and not a summary to be seen. Ditto for everything else. BTW, thanks for all the links to my site, I'm sure it will increase readership! :)--FWDixon 14:20, 27 August 2005 (UTC) Oh Really? Lets try a few just on the Undercover Brothers.
Extreme Danger (#1) - 4/05
Finnan: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games. Amazon: Mission: To find the mastermind behind a possible attack at the Big Air Games.
Running On Fumes (#2) - 4/05
Finnan: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and determine the power behind a possibly dangerous Utopian community with potential plans for criminal activity within the oil industry.
Boardwalk Bust (#3) - 4/05
Finnan: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air. Amazon: Mission: Investigate and put a halt to the recent rash of jewelry store robberies. Potential danger on the ground and in the air.
OH! You only plagiarized SOME of the summaries?
Why not claim that Amazon plagiarized also, after all the description came from the back cover of the book and falls under the "Fair Use" provisions. But you don't care about that, you are just a pathetic hate-filled loser with no life and an ax to grind. Very sad.--FWDixon 15:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
LOL. Now you didn't write them. I thought I was a liar? Guess you are huh? So WHAT summaries did you write? What was that MY summaries stuff you were saying to Phillip?
You and I both know I was refering to the summaries on the original series title pages. Being an Amazon associate gives me "fair use" to quote portions of the books you questioned. You really ought to learn what you're talking about before you spew your hatred here.--FWDixon 15:10, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Amazon cannot give you rights to use publisher's book summaries Finnan, any more than Wal Mart or anyone else can. Everything on your pages was copied from all sorts of sources and you know it. If people want more examples I will give them more.
All publishers give the right to quote portions of their books for review and advertising purposes. It's also legal to quote portions of books under the "Fair Use" provisions of the copyright law. But you don't care about that, you're just a sad, obsessed person with no life and a lot of hatred inside. -- FWDixon 15:38, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
A book summary is original writing protected by copyright. Summarizing a book in your own words is not a copyright violation but copying a summary without permission especially for commercial gain IS.
Only one link to each web site should be permitted on the main page. The Bayport Times link should be removed as a link to it exists from the Hardy Boys Unofficial Home Page. 69.205.1.91 18:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I just read through this article for the first time, and noticed a book title that needed to be italicized. Then I noticed the page was locked so I read this discussion. I went back to the main page and lo-and-behold it was unlocked. Good timing for me! If only I had that luck with traffic lights. :)
I do not believe the notice at the beginning of this article is in line with Wikipedia policy. If the information is in Wikipedia then it is understood that it is not copyrighted. So it follows that the notice only serves to indicate authorship, which is not appropriate within Wikipedia.
I recommend a total rewrite of the article, which would not be a big task - excepting the list of book titles, it is only comprised of a handful of paragraphs. http://hardyboys.bobfinnan.com/ could then be listed as a reference. Whether or not that website is 100% original or not (and I am not inferring that it isn't) will no longer be an issue, as this article will no longer be a copy / paste. -- Dan East 20:18, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Previous discussions on this page have been archived
The link to Hardy Boys memoribillia also falls under the concensus of one link per site on main article pages because it is part of The Unofficial Hardy Boys Web Site. 69.205.9.31 18:01, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Took it out. Thanks! -- Sitearm | Talk 04:27, 2005 September 1 (UTC)
Looks like an additional consensus to keep the word "commercial" in the Bob Finnan link description, as on Nancy Drew. -- Sitearm | Talk 04:50, 2005 September 4 (UTC)
Agree with Sitearm and Dan East. "Commercial" is an accurate description for the Bob Finnan Hardy Boys link as a comparison with the other links will show. A related discussion is taking place at User_talk:Who#FWDixon.2FBob_Finnan.27s_Link_Spamming Solo1 22:33, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Is there any support for rolling up all of these one line summaries into just one page?
lots of issues | leave me a message 13:58, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
The list of "major features" in the Casefiles section is copied word-for-word from my website [2] (excluding a couple of changes). I'm not really sure what should be done about this... -- WillNL 17:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The article repeatedly uses an uppercase D when referring to the "Hardy Boys Digests." This implies that "Hardy Boys Digests" is a proper noun -- the official title of the series (like "Hardy Boys Casefiles"). But "Digests" is not the official title; it's a descriptive term used by collectors. Since it's not actually a title, I don't think we should capitalize the "d" in "Hardy Boys Digests", just as we wouldn't capitalize the "p" in "Hardy Boys paperbacks" or the "b" in "Hardy Boys books". Rather, I think we should probably spell it "Hardy Boys digests". What do people think about this? -- WillNL 17:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
"The Clues Brothers books were aimed at younger readers, particularly in third and fourth grades." Not to sound stupid, but how old is "third and fourth grades"? Could somebody who knows please replace the wording with specific ages? Fuzzibloke 14:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
A number of the internal links for this article (including, but not limited to, pretty much every title link and Frank and Joe) link to the 'wrong' pages...Frank, for instance, links to an Australian author. -- Stretch 04:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
If memory serves sometime in the late 90s their was a tv show based on the boys adventures. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.89.187.166 ( talk) 08:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC).
I have put some info about that series on THe Hardy Boys article. Did some time ago. WHLfan 18:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Many (almost everyone) of the working links in section 'Casefiles', link to articles with similar names, but with no relevance to the hardy boys. Someone should suffix all those links with '(Hardy Boys)' 80.162.254.106 18:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree, it also happens in the Hardy Boys digests list. for example #179 Passport to Danger links to a Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew super-mystery, not the Hardy boys digest book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.117.4.55 ( talk) 00:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Naming convention normally says not to use "The" in the title unless it's an official part of the name, like The Beatles, but I see "Hardy Boys" used a lot of times without "The" in front of it, so I don't think it's an official necessary part of the name. Should we move it? Night Gyr ( talk/ Oy) 10:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
'The' IS an official part of the name. The only series that dosent have 'the' in it is: Nancy Drew and Hardy Boys SuperMystery series. But in the new series that came out last year they chagnd that to: Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys Super Mystery. So 'the' is an official part of the name.
WHLfan
18:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Removed this:
Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew S1 is out on uk DVD 16TH JULY
It was right below the first paragraph. Someone more knowledgeable than myself on this should re-add it if and where appropriate. Also, you might want to add another line below the first paragraph to even out the spacing (I didn't re-add it myself because I didn't want to spam the edit history). -- CCFreak2K 06:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that series on this page go in order of date except for the Clues Brothers (1997-2000) which are before the Casefiles (1987-1998). The Crossover section is also out of order.
This is what order it is in now:
3 The (original) Hardy Boys Mystery Stories (1927–1979)
4 The Hardy Boys Mystery Stories ("Digests") (1979–2005)
5 The Clues Brothers (1997–2000)
6 The Hardy Boys Casefiles (1987–1998)
7 The Hardy Boys: Undercover Brothers (2005-Date)
7.1 Undercover Brothers Super Mysterys (2006-Date)
7.2 Undercover Brothers Graphic Novels (2005-Date)
8 Crossovers
8.1 Hardy Boys and Tom Swift Ultra Thriller Series (1992–1993)
8.2 Nancy Drew and Hardy Boys SuperMystery Series (1988–1998)
8.3 Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys Super Mystery Series (2007-Date)
8.4 Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys Be a Detective Mystery Stories (1984-1985)
This is what order I think it should be in:(Bold shows the sections that should be moved)
3 The (original) Hardy Boys Mystery Stories (1927–1979)
4 The Hardy Boys Mystery Stories ("Digests") (1979–2005)
5 The Hardy Boys Casefiles (1987–1998)
6 The Clues Brothers (1997–2000)
7 The Hardy Boys: Undercover Brothers (2005-Date)
7.1 Undercover Brothers Super Mysterys (2006-Date)
7.2 Undercover Brothers Graphic Novels (2005-Date)
8 Crossovers
8.1 Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys Be a Detective Mystery Stories (1984-1985)
8.2 Nancy Drew and Hardy Boys SuperMystery Series (1988–1998)
8.3 Hardy Boys and Tom Swift Ultra Thriller Series (1992–1993)
8.4 Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys Super Mystery Series (2007-Date)
Should this be changed? ( WHLfan 16:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)).
Reproducing content from List of Hardy Boys Original Titles which is being deleted for ease of reference, as I note this article doesn't contain the individual dates. Espresso Addict 23:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
This is a list of Hardy Boys Books.
Unnumbered: Detective Handbook 1959
I found that someone had been, sadly, copy/pasting material into Wikipedia in violation of copyright - but it identified a resource that can be cited as a reference for such summaries that one *writes oneself*: [3]
Enjoy! -- Alvestrand 21:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
There was a novel where the two visit a war-torn country overseas and in one scene, one of them is forced to fire a machine gun -at- a pursuing group of enemies. Due to circumstances it is not known if anyone is hit. This, of course, causes intense emotional agony. Not only should this book be noted specifically, I'm wondering, personally, which novel it is because I want to re-read it also. -- Lots42 ( talk) 19:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Is it a Casefiles novel? - WHLfan ( talk) 23:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
This book was called "Revenge of the Desert Phantom" book #84. Books #84 and #85 very much like the Casefiles until the style of writing was changed back to a normal Hardy Boys mystery when Minstrel began publishing the books. In #85, Frank and Joe didn't shoot guns although it was still like a Casefile book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.227.112.41 ( talk) 10:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Wanted hardyboys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if someone could make a Infobox for the characters in The Hardy Boys, i tried but im not very good at makeing them.
i was thinking some thing like this:
could someone make something like that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WHLfan ( talk • contribs) 02:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
The numbering of titles published by Armada Paperbacks for the UK (non-American) market is different. Any idea why? RISadler ( talk) 12:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I recently acquired three books of the series -- #12, #32, #34. I used to own #12 and #25 from around 1971-73, and a bit past that time I acquired #19. My cousin had #8 and #34, and I alternately borrowed and returned them.
When I re-read #12 and #34 upon reacquiring them in the last month, I wasn't sure I noticed any differences in #12, but while reading #34, I did get the feeling of differences, and I became certain of them toward the end of the book. Are there exact years for the rewrite of each book, and was the original withdrawn and become unavailable for reading at those times? I do feel that the #34 as I originally read it was superior.
And are there places on the Internet to download and read the books? I remain interested in reading the 53 books that I've never read, though of course, I prefer versions that don't have racial stereotypes. GBC ( talk) 00:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Here's a list from http: slash slash hardyboys dot bobfinnan dot com slash hbos dot htm#top that gives the issue years of original and revised.
GBC ( talk) 02:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
And so on. So basically we keep the same list that is already in the article but with the pub date(s) in (). WHLfan ( talk) 03:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I have contributed quite a few Hardy Boys related articles to Wikipedia, but since many Hardy related subjects do not adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines such as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability, many articles on such subjects are tagged for deletion. At first I did not quite understand this but I have since come to see why some Wikipedians believe articles such as Mr. Pizza may not have a place on the wiki.
After some thought on the issue I considered a wiki for The Hardy Boys, and nothing else. A place where all and every Hardy related article would be accepted. Having visited Wookieepedia I discovered Wikia, and soon afterwards requested The Hardy Boys Wiki.
The Hardy Boys Wiki has been up and running for over six months now, and we are currently working on nearly 300 articles. So any time a Hardy Boys article does not belong on Wikipedia, you can always write an article on the subject at The Hardy Boys Wiki.
I don't want to sound like a spammer or something trying to get people to a site, but I know from experience that many Wikipedians do not appreciate many of the Hardy Boys articles, which are considered non-relevant to the wiki, and I thought it would be good if users contributing Hardy articles, which are unwelcome on Wikipedia could be directed to The Hardy Boys Wiki.
WHLfan ( talk) 05:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Hardy boys cover 01.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 11:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |