Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
On hold
Nice work! I'm placing this on hold until a few minor issues can be addressed: the weak or nonexistent citations that I marked with {{ fact}} tags. It would also be helpful to have a separate section on the band's style and more information on critical reception of their albums. However, I think this article does enough for Good Article status in that regard.-- ragesoss ( talk) 05:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I fixed the portions that you marked with {{ fact}} tags. I had to remove one since I couldn't find a decent citation, and added citations for the other two. I might try to work on a style section, but I'm not entirely sure how to go about it. Either way, I'll see what I can do. Thanks for your input! Rwiggum ( Talk/ Contrib) 07:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
GA passed
Great job. This meets all the Good Article criteria, although I don't think it is yet sufficiently comprehensive to qualify as a Featured Article.-- ragesoss ( talk) 08:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)