The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in response to
Jalen Rose's comments in The Fab Five, which has become the highest-rated
ESPN documentary,
Grant Hill's response was shared by nearly 100,000 people on Facebook in the next few days?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
The reviews in the "Critical review" section should be in the past tense, as they were made in the past. Some are in present, while a couple even alternate back and forth. Go back through and make sure the reviews are in the past tense.
In the "Critical review" section, ...when it described Duke basketball head coach Mike Krzyzewski recruits as Uncle Toms → Is it Duke's recruits, or is it Krzyzewski's recruits? If the latter, then add an 's at the end there.
I don't think the quote box in the "Ratings" section is necessary and seems to bork the article's layout by unnecessarily sandwiching text between that quote box and the Fab Five image there.
The "Ratings" and "Story" sections should be switched in order. It seems more logical to go into the story and then go into how the film was received (i.e. ratings and critical reception).
While I saw no problems with most of the sources (they all seem to be in the citations given), refs
12,
13,
15,
22, and
23 (almost all of them except one are from the Forbes.com website) are deadlinks and need to be fixed.
On hold pending improvements to the issues mentioned above. Otherwise, the prose is pretty good (I'll make a couple more copyedits in there), and the coverage is also good. –
MuZemike20:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
The Fab Five (film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.