From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Argento Surfer (
talk ·
contribs )
15:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
"the Judge had hired a private investigator ... at the suggestion of Jack Ziegler... In return, the Judge influenced some legislation to suit Ziegler." It's not clear how the suggestion and later influence are connected. Hiring a PI may not be the most common thing, but I don't get why the mere suggestion of it warrants repayment.
Clarified.
Fish +
Karate
08:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
What's the point of the similar deaths of the senator's son and girlfriend? It sounds ominous when first mentioned, but never seems relevant later.
Clarification added, it's from chapter 59 of the book but I couldn't find a proper reference for it.
Fish +
Karate
08:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
Please review my
copyedits for accuracy and clarity
All good, thank you.
Fish +
Karate
08:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
"unmistakably a product by a legal academic" - this quote needs to be attributed inline.
Done.
Fish +
Karate
08:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
no concern
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
no concern
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
Is FictFact reliable? I think
this and
this might be suitable replacements for the cited information.
It probably is for something as basic as that, but replaced anyway.
Fish +
Karate
08:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
C. It contains
no original research :
no concern
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
no concern. Earwig's higher-end matches are quotes attributed inline.
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
no concern
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
no concern
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
no concern
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
no concern
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
no concern
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
no concern
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
In good shape overall, but there are a few points under 1A that need to be addressed before I can promote.
Argento Surfer (
talk )
18:12, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
@
Argento Surfer : Responded.
Fish +
Karate
08:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
reply