This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Diary of a Young Girl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 12, 2007, June 12, 2011, June 12, 2015, June 12, 2016, June 12, 2017, June 12, 2019, and June 12, 2022. |
|
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
See extensive discussion at Talk:Anne Frank#Removal of “speculative content”. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 01:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The word :Jewish (or Jewish girl) is not mentioned in this entry, why is that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.8.108 ( talk) 13:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The article contains borderline holocaust denial type claims about the diary supposedly being written in a pen that wasn't invented yet:
The claims here are facially ridiculous, the diary was first published in Dutch in 1947. How could it have been fabricated with a ballpoint pen post 1951 when it had been published in Dutch for years earlier? My assumption would be that a holocaust denier looked up the English publication date of 1952 and tried to make a claim of it being manufactured with a technology post 1945 but pre 1952. But this is ridiculous as, again, it was not first published in English, we have year 1947 edition prints of the book in Dutch. The claim in the article is misleading, and either needs to be removed, or debunked. This information is already being cited in far right holocaust denial memes, it is deeply irresponsible to include it without a debunking and lend credence to such nonsense. 2601:140:8900:61D0:A098:6DB2:F89A:6CCF ( talk) 18:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Are there any WP policies on autorship? Anne Frank Fonds [ is clear] on additinal copyright holders for the two editions (47 and 91); they should be added too the infobox imho (same as Imagine now lists Yoko Ono) Ffaffff ( talk) 15:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
“created a new work”(by virtue of his
editing, merging and trimming entries from (Anne Frank's) diary and notebooks and reshaping them into “kind of a collage”), and should be regarded, for copyright purposes, as a "co-author" of that work. Also agree that the Foundation makes a similar claim about the work done by Mirjam Pressler in editing the later version. Those seem important, noteworthy claims, and we should cover them in the article; as we do. Not yet certain that those claims mean that we should include either in the Infobox's "author" field - the Infobox covers the first (1947) edition, not subsequent editions; reliable sources, including WorldCat, do not include either Otto or Mirjam as co-authors of that edition; the NYT source indicates that there is a difference of opinion as to the validity of the Foundation's claims; the Infobox field is a "plain English" author, not necessarily a "for copyright purposes" author (Noting, per NYT, the Foundation states that attribution on the books will not change, remaining as "Anne Frank" only). Could possibly conceive of an inclusion of Otto with explicit description of "editor" or "compiler"; but would still like to see what a broader section of the community thinks. Also agree that picking the right noticeboard is difficult. - Ryk72 talk 03:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I am unable to do so but can someone please fix this page. The Synopsis is clearly not the correct page and is full of graphic sexual language. 1.144.105.215 ( talk) 12:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)