From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 17:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC) reply

This is a good album. The articles become better and better :)-- GoP T C N 17:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): {{GAList/checkayeb (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Fails WP:NFCC, 3 a) and b). I think the last could be shortened, but overall meets the criteria as it is a significant re-release. I would remove the second image with the white background completely. The first is far too large. -- GoP T C N 13:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Not sure what you mean by the last could be shortened(?), but I've removed the second image as suggested. Will look for smaller-size version of first image. Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 20:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply
  1. Overall: Excellent article.
    Pass/Fail:
And if you answer the question raised by an ip in 2011, then that would be an advantage :): What happened to the child on the album cover? Where is he/she today? . Regards.-- GoP T C N 13:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Fantastic − thanks GoP. Yes, the child on the cover: either aged in his/her early 40s now, I guess, or never made it out of the camps in northern India in 1971 (let's hope it's the first option). Good call with the album covers, by the way. The white-background CD cover really was unnecessary as an alt example, and I think the more smoky appearance of the (replaced) original cover is actually truer to how the boxed record looked (from what I've seen over the years). PS: what Olympics? ; ) ... Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 01:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC) reply