This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
As it stands, this is a bit short. I make it 1128 characters of non-quoted text, whereas 1500 characters are needed. Otherwise, seems okay. --
Epipelagic (
talk)
22:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)reply
I agree, that was my error. I forgot to discount quoted text. I could add content but that wouldn't make it qualified within the first five days. I think it would be best to withdraw this nomination in favor of the nominations that did meet the criteria when nominated. Thanks for the review.
My76Strat (
talk)
23:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)reply