![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I'll clean it up some and detag it. Not going to write a master's thesis on it and not responsible for previous screw-ups (my byline not on it), but I'll make it better.
-TCO
Snap a photo of the group or the office or leaders or such and upload. I grabbed best free one I found by Google search, but I think one sans client would be better. -TCO
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Thanks for the suggestion. We've uploaded a photo of our front door to Wikicommons for use with this article per your request, and I made the edit to the page.
Linqink ( talk) 19:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't think we should use the talk pages of articles to label contributors. Tagging is a nasty, nasty habit of non-contributor, version-fighters regardless. In any case, I've gone over it and it is insane to leave the thing taggerized forever with one contributors name up there. Might as well say, mean old TCO worked on it. ;-) If you really think the think needs more de-COIing, then SOFIXIT and prune the parts you don't like (or even AFD it). 71.127.137.171 ( talk) 03:47, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The word nonprofits is used several times at the beginning of this article in a way that suggests that the editor is used to using it as a fairly common noun. It is not a familiar use of the word for me and gives something of an impression of overslickness and even jargonese. Are you simply refering to a non-profit organisation? I should add that I am from the UK which may be the reason I do not see nonprofit as common parlance. Is it different in the US? Tom Hedger ( talk) 10:42, 10 September 2014 (UTC)