This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
A fact from The Belnord appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in the 1970s, residents of the Belnord in New York City had to sneak in refrigerators at night?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that a New York City official likened a dispute at the Belnord apartment building to the siege of Beirut? Source: Lavietes 2004
ALT2: ... that the owner of the Belnord apartment building in New York City bought free houses in Florida and Nevada for existing residents? Source: Lagnado, Lucette (July 3, 2001). "Old Notions: All-Natural Retirement Isn't So Easy, a Look At the Belnord Shows --- In a Luxury Building, a Duel Between Senior Services And a Landlord's Vision --- The Symbolism of Benches". The Wall Street Journal.
ALT3: ... that the owner of the Belnord apartment building bought houses for residents, then rented out their old apartments? Source: Lagnado 2001
ALT5: ... that residents of the Belnord in New York City had to sneak in refrigerators at night because the building's owner would not let them replace their appliances? Source: Harris 2013
First hook is fine per the source, but in the article body compared the dispute to the siege of Beirut, "where one or both parties are shooting at us" to me implies that the speaker felt that parties were shooting at him and his department. However, looking at the first part of is quote ("I'm not going to get myself into a West Beirut situation, where one..), it seems he wanted to avoid that.
ALT4 & ALT5 - I'm not seeing support for the hook in the archived version of the source. What's the relevant text from the source used for these? (accused others of infractions from illegal subletting to ripping out fixtures to installing appliances was the closest that I saw there.
@
BennyOnTheLoose: Thanks for the review. For ALT4 and ALT5, I accidentally provided the wrong source, which has now been fixed. I've also rephrased the article so that the "siege of Beirut" quip is clearer. I will do a QPQ soon.
Epicgenius (
talk)
16:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Legoktm: My pleasure. And if you have any hook ideas related to Only Murders in the Building, feel free to add them. The six hooks I proposed above were just the things that jumped out at me.
Epicgenius (
talk)
17:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
2b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
I’ve read up until the history section and my only comments so far are:
Are the images
here under copyright or did submitting them to the state make them public domain? They’re in b&w but there are a couple good ones.
The photographs are still under copyright. Works made by the federal government are automatically PD, but generally not works made by state governments (and particularly not those made for state governments).
Epicgenius (
talk)
19:19, 11 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.