This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D)#Saucer separation|saucer separation]] The anchor (#Saucer separation) is no longer available because it was
deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Provocative History?
In the episode notes, it said about Crusher "The implication in this scene, expounded on in further episodes, is that she has a provocative history beyond her officially known one, but it is never explained exactly what this is." When was it ever hinted at that she had a provocative history?
TwistedRed02:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Some people just work too hard to come up with trivia, when we don't even want any on wiki. Deleting it as it not noteworthy trivia. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.137.207.191 (
talk)
03:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Also some other stuff, like the stardate mention, if you read thru the stardate article, it explains that it is unclear how exactly it works as it sometimes decreases and sometimes increases (30620.1 is before 23859.7 for instance). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.137.207.191 (
talk)
03:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)reply
"The field prevents the Enterprise from beaming up the away-team. " -- Might want to clarify a little, the last graph says only Riker was affected by the beam.
"Story editor Maurice Hurley saw the plot of "The Arsenal of Freedom" as commentary on the sale of American Grumman F-14 Tomcats to Iran taken to the "ultimate conclusion"." -- A few things here: one, you might want to be more specific about the incident, or explain what current event inspired it. Two, I was under the impression that there wasn't a lot of allegory in the Next Generation, unlike the Original Series. Was this a normal to have a 'moral' to the story? Three, explain the analogy a little more.
I've added some background. The TNG morals only appear probably in about 5% of the episodes. There's more morals in a season of DS9 or TOS than in the entire TNG run! I'm not 100% sure of what Hurley was trying to say, but I think he was saying that the country went bankrupt because no one bought the technology.
Miyagawa (
talk)
18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)reply
"The story originally had Picard dying" -- Had they really wanted to kill off Stewart's character or was he going to come back to life at the end of the episode. As worded it sounds like Stewart was supposed to leave the show.
No duplicate links. All external links are working. No images so there are no problems with licensing, and there are no problems with article stability and neutrality.