![]() | TaylorâBurton Diamond has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The Channel 4 documentary Elizabeth Taylor: Auction of a Lifetime, has an interview with the man from Sotheby's who took the diamond to Switzerland to show Taylor and Burton prior to the auction. He tells how it was Taylor's lawyer who bid on her behalf, and that she rang him immediately afterwards to ask how much she had won it for. On being told that she had not, she said that she and Burton had to buy it. The article is incorrect to suggest Burton bought it for her. She was going to buy it for herself at the auction; and bought it with Burton from Cartier after the auction. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.7.177.210 ( talk) 21:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:TaylorâBurton Diamond/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This wikipedia entry is completely plagiarized from
http://famousdiamonds.tripod.com/taylor-burtondiamond.html
Tralinds
05:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)tralinds
|
Substituted at 18:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CheCheDaWaff ( talk · contribs) 17:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I am planning to review this article and expect to be done tonight. --
â«CheCheâ«
talk
17:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion this article has very few outstanding issues. If the technical issue is resolved and the prose in the 'Purchase by Burton and Taylor' section slightly refactored, I'm confident this article would qualify for good article status.
-- â«CheCheâ« talk 18:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)