This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tata Nano Singur controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Tata Nano Singur controversy. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Tata Nano Singur controversy at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone should update the article if they find more links especially for Tata's role in all of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.73.65 ( talk) 15:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
According to the Economist article, the Kolkata High Court permitted the use of the 1894 Land Acquisition Act: "Supreme Courts in several American states have ruled that governments cannot expropriate land for private development, but Kolkata’s High Court has judged differently. What counts as a public purpose, it has noted, is a “socio-economic question” that should be left to local governments to answer."
But the article states the opposite:The law has provisions for state taking over privately held land for public purposes but not for developing private businesses. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.
The source/reference given in the article is a dead link.
Should the article be corrected? Wefa ( talk) 14:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Singur Tata Nano controversy. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Singur Tata Nano controversy. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
I want it to be translated into Bangla. Gentleman1223 ( talk) 16:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved, the move to 2008–2009 Singur farmers' protest was performed without consensus, hence the close is a "speedy revert" to Tata Nano Singur controversy. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
2008–2009 Singur farmers' protest → Tata Nano Singur controversy – Per WP:COMMONNAME Tayi Arajakate Talk 03:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)