This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Sussex was a ship; the Sussex pledge was a political declaration. They are not the same subject. Although the Sussex pledge article is not a very good one as it stands, the subject is probably sufficiently notable to merit a stand-alone article. If this article is to be merged with anything, it should be with
Submarine Warfare or
Intensified submarine warfare.
Can I suggest that you post some arguments as to why this merger would be a good idea?
the second sentence is internally contradictory.it lists a citation, 'unrestricted submarine warfare', and then describes a restriction, armed merchantmen, but not passenger ships. etwas ist hier los!
Toyokuni3 (
talk)
15:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Unspoken Facts
As clearly stated in one of the links to the article (
http://www.uscsumter.edu/~tpowers/hist112/usentww1.html ), germany wanted something in return for their pledge wich they did not receive.
I think this is important and musst be mentioned in the wiki article.