This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Surendranagar district be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I completed a copy edit of this page. I restored links to the Census data, as they seem to work, and added more data to the infobox from the Census records. It looks like there will be a new census in 2011, so that data should be updated next year. I deleted a fair amount of non- WP:NPOV text, especially from the Tourism section, but it still reads like a travel brochure. It needs cleanup, preferably with attention paid to English translations of non-English terms. I also deleted some commented text that looked promotional.// Macwhiz ( talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Are all these businesses really notable enough to warrant inclusion in an international encyclopedia? I noticed not a one of them has their own article. That seems to imply that the answer is "no." This list seems like it may be more about promoting than informing. // Macwhiz ( talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The People section seems to be about Surendranagar city, not the district. Can someone verify this and delete it if needed? // Macwhiz ( talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
This section looks like a laundry list. It makes little sense, especially if you don't already know what these things are. Does it really belong in an encyclopedia article? If it does, it should be turned into a definition list that includes details on each dish: what it's comprised of, why it's notable, etc. // Macwhiz ( talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I think legends are notable, but the legend included here is not only unsourced, it's vague. Is it really that notable? If it's notable, perhaps it should have its own article instead? // Macwhiz ( talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)