This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the
scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please
Join,
Create, and
Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
The discussion of "Victim-Precipitated Suicide" also seems to echo the Circumcellions, a fourth century Christian group ( involved with the Donatists ) who attacked people they considered the enemies of the church in the hope of being martyred - including alleged assaults on fully armed Roman Legionaires, which is the historical analogue of the situation discussed here. This is allegedly discussed in WHC Frends, "The Rise of Christianity", cited on
the African Christianity Homepage. If anyone has this book and can confirm the passages, I think they'd be a great addition to this article. --
219.164.33.4206:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Ironic?
Is the term used in an ironic sense often (if at all). Although it is plausible that suicide by cop is used this way "in some circles", I couldn't find any references to this practice. But that may just mean I wasn't thorough enough.
MSchmahl01:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Unless there is a link or reference to a published copy of that essay, it's got to go. -
Snpoj
What about a link to a summary of the essay by the writer? the preceding unsigned comment was written by 67.162.31.206.
I tend to agree with Snpoj. Unless Michelle Chan's notability, as an expert in the field of psychology or religious history, is established, her opinion doesn't really belong here. --
MSchmahl12:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't see any problem with a link of the summary if the link is listed under "External Links". Even a short description of what the link is about would be ok imho. -
Snpoj
Removal of "Michelle Chan" essay material
[Removed: Author
Jay Black of Guttersnipe,
Zarboki, and
MSchmahl disagree over the inclusion of (a) Michelle Chan's Jesus S.B.C. theory and (b) long description of Guttersnipe novella in External links. They eventually agree on a simple citation-style link. Talk removed by
User:Jay Black, possibly as part of a
MindWipe.]
On a more constructive note, I also think we have to agree that S.B.C. is a fairly common principle in literature as well as filmmaking. I myself came to the page after watching an old episode of
NCIS that features this concept and wording. The examples should be limited to fairly well-known works. If you want a page that is a list of all examples of S.B.C. then make a separate article and link it from here. Surely the aim of the page should be to inform about the topic not list every example in pop-culture.
Zarboki08:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I agree completely with Zarboki. I see no indication, either in this article or elsewhere, that Michelle Chan is a reputable biblical scholar. I was on the verge of removing the disputed content myself. —
MSchmahl09:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm fine with it like it is now, just like how that Chan stuff was redone. imo, if you've got something interesting that you did personally but that isn't "notable" just put it as a link at the bottom with a short description. -
Snpoj04:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
John Wilkes Booth?
Anyone know why he was included in the "see also" list? There's nothing in his article indicating the reason for the link, assuming you make a distinction between intending to commit suicide (for whatever reason) vs. an unwillingness to be "taken alive," for which there would be plenty of rational reasons, such as surety of being tortured or killed later anyway.
I hadn't noticed it until now. Yes, that should go, it's not a relevant example. This phenomenon requires that the person deliberately provoke lethal action of law enforcement, with the intent of being killed in that way.
Legitimus (
talk)
02:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Original reference of 'Victim-Precipitated Homicide'
It seems to me that the term 'Victim-Precipitated Homicide' was coined by Wolfgang M.E. Altough, i cannot confirm this and don't know if this was a master thesis or if he was a "veteran Canadian police officer."
Wolfgang M.E. (1959). "Suicide by means of victim-precipitated homicide". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychopathology and Quarterly Review of Psychiatry and Neurology. 20 (Oct–Dec): 335–349.
To be quite frank, "cop" does sound quite tacky and is an americanism not used widely elsewhere. I would suggest that the name be changed to "police assisted suicide" or "Suicide by provoking lethal response", or something else a little more encyclopedic. This is not intended as a dig at whoever created this article, just a suggestion to make it sound a little more professional if you will.
Benjaminstewart0520:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm going to have to disagree -- I hear this frequently reported in the (American) media as "suicide-by-cop". In fact, it seems to come most often from law enforcement officers and others in that community. I have no cites right now, but as someone who watches crime trends in the U.S., I am content with the term. As a Wikipedia user, "suicide by cop" is the search string i used to find the article/subject, and I was pleased to find it on the first hit. I understand that without cites I'm merely stating opinion, but I believe the term to be entrenched enough that
WP:CITE and
WP:V could be satisfied if needed. I guess I would recommend that reports from reliable news sources (which source crime and psych experts) be relied upon to verify that "suicide by cop" is the predominant term for this subject. Merci --
ManfrenjenStJohn21:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
On second thought, I realize that my position may be unique to American use of the phenomenon. But I think the term "police-assisted suicide" is simply not recognized here, and that if referred to as such, no layman would understand it to be phenomenon we are discussing. To anyone outside the U.S., all I can say is that "suicide by cop" is what it's called here, as surely as the fact that we call french-fries what our British brothers call chips. I agree the article should meet the global standards of Wikipedia, but not without noting that "suicide by cop" is the preferred terminology in the US, and I am certain that I have read that the term originated in the law enforcement community here. Sorry to be your typical myopic American :) -- Amend it to make it global, but keep the American viewpoint -- That's my suggestion. Thanks. --
ManfrenjenStJohn21:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I completely agree. "Cop" is a slang term - whether in the UK or the USA. It's not an Atlantic divide, this one: the slang word "copper" exists in British English too, as a substitute for "policeman" (or, to be gender-neutral, "police officer"). Nevertheless, "cop" remains slang, informal English on both sides of the Atlantic. An encyclopædia article should not be titled with slang, when more formal terms could be used. I support a move to "Police-assisted suicide".
EuroSongtalk09:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm not really in favor of changing it, just because I have yet to find any mention of this phenomenon in a news source that calls it something other than 'suicide by cop'. It certainly is only called this in the U.S. other than in scholarly articles (where it is at least mentioned as such). I understand that some complain this might be a U.S. perspective, but I think it is presumptive to assume this is a 'worldwide' phenomenon, either. If this behavior is most common in the U.S. and U.K. why shouldn't the page use the parlance most used to describe it in these areas? I never hear police assisted suicide, just 'suicide by cop' or, occasionally, 'suicide by police.'
Epthorn11:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Always suicide?
It would be nice to see some examination of the issue of whether the mentally ill person is always intending to commit suicide or if he or she is simply trying to provoke a reaction, perhaps undefined, necessitated by his or her mental state (e.g. the need for attention). Certainly this must have been discussed in the journals and articles cited. I imagine every case in which an officer claims "suicide by cop" might not necessarily be so; some people act irrationally just because. Adding this issue of uncertainty into the article would seem poignant.
66.57.225.7714:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)reply
This still needs work. The mere presence of a suicide note, for example, is not sufficient to establish what happened—some people carry around one of those for years without attempting suicide. Neither is the use of an unloaded or toy gun, which might merely speak to ignorance of police procedures or general confusion.
I'd like to remove the entire sentence which reads
Some cases are obvious, such as pointing an unloaded or non-functioning gun (such as a toy gun or starter's pistol) at officers, or the presence of a suicide note.
I think the truth is suicide is complicated, and shouldn't be considered as the "obviously correct" explanation for police homicide to the extent of precluding a thorough investigation: The phrase "some cases are obvious" is not likely to be a good motto for such an investigation.
However, whether or not Pacino knows his gun is empty is left somewhat ambiguous.
I'm removing this line. It's not ambiguous. He clearly is seen releasing the slide lock on
his pistol in a conceiled manner before pointing it at the law enforcement officers. The slide
only locks back like that when the last round is fired. He was trying to give the illusion
of a loaded gun. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Kensuke Aida (
talk •
contribs)
00:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC).reply
The article completely miss the fact that phenomenon it describes is really a murder, not suicide. The person who actually kill the man is a cop.
No it wasn't, cop-hater. Suicide is to deliberately bring about one's own death, and does not require any action on the person's part. Laying down on a train track, stepping in front of a bus, etc. If someone is exploiting another person's actions with the full intention of getting themselves killed, it is suicide.
Legitimus (
talk)
in fiction: minority report
"In the 2002 film Minority Report, Leo Crow who is earlier falsely suspected in abducting John Anderton's (played by Tom Cruise) son, commits suicide using Anderton after Leo's conspiracy and will to die in order to get money for his family is discovered by Anderton."
Anderton doesn't actually shoot him, Leo kills himself. Anderton decides not to, did Leo pull the trigger or just jump out the window? Can't remember which. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.5.162.99 (
talk)
21:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)reply
He either sticks his fingers into the trigger guard, or squeezes Anderton's hand, either way he physically manipulates the gun to make it fire. This is not suicide by cop, because Anderton no longer intended to shoot him. He more or less shot himself completely on his own, Anderton just happened to still have his hand on the gun at the time.
It is a similar concept, and can be linked to, though it works differently. It's arguable that the person in state-assisted suicide did not intend suicide all along, but rather they prefer death to life imprisonment only once they are caught. It could also be argued that their actions a trial are a "reverse-psychology" approach to evading execution, in that they are trying to create a impression that they are mentally unfit (most states will not execute legally insane people) or as a way to deny the retributive satisfaction of the court and public, in that the court is given them what they want rather than a punishment.
Legitimus (
talk)
14:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Leeland Eisenberg, who took hostages in one of Hillary Clinton's campaign offices in December 2007, claimed afterwards it was an attempted suicide by cop.
The link for Leeland Eisenberg redirects to an article on Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, but there's aboslutely no mention of Eisenberg or the incident that took place. Maybe a new article for Eisenberg should be intitiated? I really want to know what happened, because I apparently missed it during the campaign!
96.238.115.21 (
talk)
02:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)reply
In the end of the film Tell Them Willie Boy Is Here, the title character (played by
Robert Blake) tries to shoot down his pursuer, Sheriff Cooper (
Robert Redford). After killing the
Paiute outlaw, Cooper checks his gun which turns out to be unloaded. He preferred to die rather than be captured.
In the closing sequence of the 1970 film The Family aging mob hitman Jeff (
Charles Bronson), after killing his ex-girlfriend (played by his real life wife
Jill Ireland), provokes a rookie police officer to kill him.
In the 1993 film Falling Down, a disgruntled man (
Michael Douglas) provokes a police sergeant (
Robert Duvall) into killing him by pretending to draw a weapon from his pocket — actually a toy
water pistol. He chooses to end his life in this way so that his family can collect on his
life insurance policy, which would not pay any benefits if he killed himself.
In the book "
The Outsiders",
Dallas Winston takes out an unloaded gun in front of the arriving police, and is immediately gunned down.
Tibor Fischer's collection of short stories Don't read this book if you are stupid contains a short story from the perspective of a man who is preparing to die by 'suicide by cop'.
In the 2007 film Reign Over Me,
Adam Sandler's character, torn by grief over the death of his family, uses an unloaded gun in an attempt to provoke two NYPD officers to kill him.
In the 2002 film The Recruit, Walther Burke (
Al Pacino) is revealed as a traitor by
CIA rookie James Clayton (
Colin Farrell). He turns his back to the responding
S.W.A.T. team, says 'Good-bye' to Clayton and then aims an unloaded pistol at the S.W.A.T. team, causing them to shoot and kill him, believing him to be a threat.
In Season Two of the American TV show Prison Break, former Chicago Mob Boss
John Abruzzi played by
Peter Stormare, acting on false information about the location of the mob informant Fibonacci is lured in to an
FBI trap. He refuses to heed
Agent Mahone's (
William Fichtner) call to surrender and raises his weapon at the FBI team in a threatening manner. The FBI officers open fire and he is killed instantly.
In the 2004 film Paparazzi, Actor Bo Laramie played by
Cole Hauser and his wife and child are involved in a car accident brought upon by a group of paparazzi. In a revenge plot he plants a movie prop gun in one of the paparazzi's car and calls the police stating "there's a guy waving a gun". This in turn leads to the paparazzo being pulled over, he attempts to produce his license but unknowingly pulls the prop gun out of his coat pocket and is gunned down by police. A newscaster later describes the incident as 'suicide by cop'.
In the 2004 film New Police Story, the main antagonist, named Joe, faces several hundred police officers as well as Officer Chan, played by
Jackie Chan. He and Chan engage in a race to put their pistols together first, and Chan wins. Joe's father, a police captain, steps forward and screams at Joe, who first began killing police officers because he hated his father. Joe looks at Chan, and in an act of reparation, helps Chan; he then places the unloaded magazine in his pistol and points it at Chan, who knows it is unloaded. Chan shouts for the officers not to shoot, but the SDU officers shoot and kill him.
In the British TV show Spooks, a woman involved in a terrorist plot commits suicide in this way to avoid being questioned.
In the 2005 novel, and subsequent film, The Da Vinci Code, the character
Silas committed suicide by cop after a vicious gunfight.
In the film Four Brothers, one of the protagonists, Angel tricks corrupt detective Fowler into committing suicide in this way by kidnapping him in his house whilst his girlfriend tells the police she thinks he intends to kill the officer. When the SWAT team arrives, Angel reveals a fake wire claiming to be working with the police and to have recorded Fowler admitting to murdering a fellow officer. Angel then allows Fowler to snatch the gun from him, and Fowler goes outside and opens fire on the SWAT who have in fact come to rescue him (and even shout to him that they are "here to help you!"), forcing them to shoot and kill him.
In the 1994 film Jimmy Hollywood, the main character (played by
Joe Pesci) attempts suicide by cop when he is surrounded by police officers in a movie theater (a homage to Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid). When he does go through with it, he survives because his girlfriend (played by
Victoria Abril) told the police ahead of time that he only had blanks.
In the 2009 adaption of the book
Taking of Pelham 123 Ryder's two assistants choose this method of death rather then go to prison
Technically it is homicide if the other person pulls the trigger, but "death by cop" occurs when you deliberately provoke your own death. You do something, such as attacking an armed man in such a way that he fears for his own life; consequently, he shoots you in self defense. A coroner may describe the death as homicide, but a psychologist would probably say you caused your death. --
Uncle Ed (
talk)
14:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)reply
This appears to be a broader-topic that 'suicide by cop' should be a section of. This would also be using a more encyclopedic, less colloquial-style expression.
ZayZayEM (
talk)
01:35, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
i think it, the entire article, a flimsy excuse for a full fledge article. It is a part of a bigger article on law enforcement which should be linked — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
64.134.70.128 (
talk)
13:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)reply
There are two broad categories of "suicide by cop". The first is when someone has committed a crime and is being pursued by the police and decides that they would rather die than be arrested. These people may not otherwise be suicidal but may simply decide that life is not worth living if they are incarcerated and thus will provoke police to kill them.
This is certainly not the only motivation. In many cases this happens because the perpetrators want to make sure that they won't be interrogated and risk implicating others. Islamic terrorists are usually instructed not to let themselves be captured alive. They usually opt to open fire at police both because suicide by police is not forbidden in Islam and to take as many policemen down with them, but they will kill themselves if they have no other choice. They are many recent examples of this (see the recent waves of terrorist attacks in Europe and related attempted arrests for instance). This should be mentioned somehow.
Bomazi (
talk)
11:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
That is a separate and distinct concept. This article is about a specific phenomenon where the goal is to be shot dead by police. From a psychological and sociological perspective, this is distinct from engaging in a firefight knowing one will lose as well as self-inflicted gunshots. I can't help but noticed it also appears to be tainted by political subtext.
Legitimus (
talk)
12:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Suicide by cop. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
This article could use a section written by someone knowledgeable in the area about the effect this has on the cop. Someone researching this (and maybe thinking about doing it?) should be aware of how this effects the officer psychologically and (depending on what the sources say) whether being involved in a shooting might have an effect on the officer's career. --
Guy Macon (
talk)
17:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply