I'll take a look at this one! I think I tidied the references on this one a while ago when it was up for DYK but haven't done any substantive editing to it other than that. Excited to dive in! —
Collintc17:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
This article is in great shape and a lot of work has clearly been put into it.
1a: Prose is easy to read and does an excellent job combining sources in a natural way. There are two places I'd like clarifications:
There are several instances where it's unclear what type of work (book, comic book, film, etc.) is being referenced; would you mind specifying? (I'm looking at Captain America: White and Black Widow in the Response section, and Gay New York in Analysis and impact but there may be a few other instances where it's ambiguous.)
In #GiveCaptainAmericaABoyfriend, it's not immediately obvious that Marvel is a Disney-owned property; would you mind specifying this either with a note or in the text somehow?
1b: Great lead summary! All other required MoS elements complied with.
2a: Strong reflist with consistent ref style.
2b: Much higher than GA-standard attribution. Great work. Tumblr statistics come from Tumblr proper and AO3 source directly sources an AO3 statistic so no qualms with those.
2c: No original research concerns.
2d:Direct quotation appears to be solely quoted and attributed, no other close paraphrasing/copyvio concerns noted.
3a: Sufficiently broad.
3b: The only concern I have here is the inclusion of the {{
tweet}} template which does not add meaningful information to the article not already covered by the preceding sentence explaining that the user made that tweet. Everything else is appropriately focused.
6a:File:Gwenpool Stucky Panel.png is FU and appropriately tagged. Evans and Stan images are freely licensed and attributed on their pages.
6b: Pics definitely relevant! I appreciate there being a source referencing the Gwenpool panels to justify their inclusion in the article.
All in all, this is very close to GA status and just needs a few touches to get there. Thanks for your patience waiting for this review. I'll give you a week although feel free to ping me whenever! Kindly —
Collintc18:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)reply