This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
designated as a contentious topic.
The first teaser for the film was released today. An official poster is also out. I think this is ready to move to the mainspace.
Hummerrocket (
talk)
14:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)reply
I think I'll remove it. I couldn't find any reliable sources that support this, and it's poorly worded in the first place.
Three non
WP:RS sources I could find plus one Reddit discussion (again, not a usable source, so I'll remove the passage for not having any
WP:V sources.)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
From: "The film has received generally positive reviews from critics"
To: "The film has received mixed reviews from critics".
Source/ Evidence: rotten tomatoes summarized critic responses: "this dazzlingly animated adventure offers little audiences haven't already seen". Score of 65 on meta critic also confirms mixed reviews.
Jeffer4646 (
talk)
01:18, 27 November 2022 (UTC)reply
But
Metacritic clearly says reviews were positive.
[1] We could discuss and maybe if the sheer
number and weight of reviews from Rotten Tomatoes justified it then we could change it but it would be better to get local consensus for that change in advance before we go contradicting what the reliable source Metacritic says. --
109.77.205.15 (
talk)
03:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Mars Needs Moms was produced by ImageMovers Digital (and is the reason why they are no longer around), not the main animation studio.
$chnauzer19:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Requested move 30 November 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Strange World (film) →
Strange World – Though it's relatively obscure for a Disney movie, this film is nevertheless now the dominant meaning for "Strange World" - as evidenced both by web searches and
Wikipedia traffic. It gets at least 50 times more views than either of the other two articles about things named "Strange World" (a
1995 single and a
short-lived 1999 TV series). Of course, that's in part due to the film having just been released, but its dominance is so great that I can't imagine it will ever not outweigh these other two meanings.
Korny O'Near (
talk)
14:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support. While some may argue this is too soon, the other two articles named "Strange World" have little notability; the film is the primary topic.
162 etc. (
talk)
16:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose This movie has just came out, and given its poor box-office performance and mediocre reception, it will probably not be popular and significant enough to be the primary "Strange World" page.
Deiadameian (
talk)
00:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The second paragraph (beginning with Strange World takes inspiration...), especially the sentence pointing out the main colour schemes, should probably be moved down to the Production/Development section of the page instead.
Narananas (
talk)
15:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)reply