This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Sorry for the late reply. For now, it can stay since the ruling is not yet in effect. I lean towards adding to hypothetical if the ruling goes into effect. Yes, SCOTUS could eventually overturn the ruling, but I think reflecting the current situation would be in line with
WP:CRYSTAL.
Prcc27 (
talk)
02:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Why are only some state aggregates listed for 538? At first, I thought it was because only swing and lean states were added, but then I saw California listed..
Prcc27 (
talk)
13:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply