Stanislaus River has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 30, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is this "hetman" nonsense? This has nothing to do with the river, and the true source of the river's name is Estanislao.
I don't understand why the sidebar has the words "River Kingstone" in large type at the top. There is no mention in the article that this name is associated with this river. LittlePortion ( talk) 17:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Stanislaus River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stanislaus River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mnnlaxer ( talk · contribs) 19:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Proposing immediate pass. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Shannon1: great work. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 14:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Idea for discussion. The History section doesn't have anything in it after 1900. I know there is history told through the following sections. But I wonder if there is some 20th century history that doesn't fit in these categories. Was there any native population in the area in the 20th century? Any noteworthy people have a connection? I don't think a long or detailed sub-section is needed. But it feels like the History section ends prematurely. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 22:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Sounds good, I'm going to pass it now. Great work. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 15:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)