![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I really think this should include anime series that fit to this description as well, like Najica Blitz Tactics, and not stay merely focused on live movies and series.-- Hard Core Rikki ( talk • contribs) 09:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
why arn't any techno thrillers here?, i don't see why they can't fit into the hard SF cartory Joeyjojo 12:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there a reason that anime titles are divided from the movies, TV series, video games, and RPG? Seems like there's a strong precedent here for just having one big list. Burrito -- Burrito Al Pastor ( talk • contribs) 08:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
How about some sources? Who uses this term? "Techno-thriller" is an established term for this kind of story ( http://www.jessesword.com/sf/view/1636), but without some sources outside of blogs, discussion groups, and marketing copy, "spy-fi" sounds like just another non-notable neologism. RLetson 17:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
How can Danger Man/Secret Agent be included. There is no science fiction element to the stories REVUpminster ( talk) 14:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
It seems the same source is being repeated without being marked. Does anybody know the template to deal with multiple citation markings?-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 22:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
User:Swpb, User:Mad Hatter We need to make a split here because there is too many topics here to be listed in one page. Better we create a separate list for it. See list of space opera media as an example.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 23:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Swpb: what is your issue with the split? That essay is too long to read. Tell me which section is relevant. I looked at the ANI report against User:Mad Hatter and other editors seem to agree with his move. What is your real issue with the split? And why is one editor opposing split. How about trying to build consensus at your end as well?-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 22:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
To editor Swpb:, To editor Mad Hatter:, let's expand the section and add more so then we can split it.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 23:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
To editor Swpb: One person can't to it alone. As an editor who is involved with the article, you also should participate.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 19:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
To editor Swpb: It was a gesture to work together, you don't need to make remarks like that. I removed them and don't make remarks like that again WP:CIVIL-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 19:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQOGmSdGGA74qvB2JFrrnUA
Science alert is a YouTube Channel based on technology where you will find all the videos in Hindi/Urdu about === Technology ===
This channel is made in Hindi/Urdu Because Pakistani and Indian technology Lover have no Obstruct of Language.
This is a technical Channel in Hindi/Urdu Click on the link to Visit; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQOGmSdGGA74qvB2JFrrnUA
Ahmad Khattak (Pakistani)I've gone through the list of examples, disambiguated some. When I found one which had neither: (1) a source saying they belong to the subgenre, or (2) any mention of Spy-Fi in their parent article, I added a citation-needed tag or deleted the entry. (The page history is always there if someone wishes to restore.) Even being sourced, though, doesn't mean they're the most notable and exemplary of the genre. The article would probably be better with a few notable examples and write-up of why they are notable. Wikipedia has a three-genre guideline, that a work should be noted as belonging to the three most-associated genres only, so a film or series that is too broad may not be strongly associated with this very specific subgenre. For example, Undercover Brother has all the elements of Spy-Fi (spying, high-tech gadgetry, a nefarious enemy and attempt to control the world), but it's more associated with other genres. This seems to be the case with comedies, the strongest exception being Austin Powers. Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. is too broad as an action-adventure-sci-fi-superhero-drama. Likewise, not every "stealth" or "spy" video game is Spy-Fi. No One Lives Forever may be the only one that belongs on the list. While I've been going through these, it seems to me that the term is very much dated to the 1960s and has since fallen out of use. It might not be bad for the article to reflect this. And, of course, if the genre is dated then that can help keep some of the inappropriate examples off the list. – Reidgreg ( talk) 22:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 12:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Spy-Fi (subgenre) → Spy-Fi – A disambiguation appears unnecessary here. The vast majority of sources refer to "Spy-Fi" as spy fiction + science fiction, such as The Incredible World of Spy-fi and The Science of James Bond as well as Spy Television. Spy-fi should simply be redirected there as well. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Jerm ( talk) 15:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
|