This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
Spin has a huge history in political rhetoric, especially where a monarch is propped up by a religion or the willingness of their subjects to believe the enemy is evil and they are infallible. Consider expansion?
Plus spin is still hugely prevalent, especially in Internet Activism. Trump frequently offers a different set of events than is the dominant narrative.
The use of Alastair Campbell as a example may be too partisan and is frequently returned to despite being an Anglocentric example.
Aquataris (
talk)
15:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes, this is the most politically biased wikipedia article I ever read, at least in english. Doesn't give any information (where does the term "spin doctor" come from?) but gives instead always the same family of politically biased examples. IMO it should be totally redone or removed; I can't imagine how it could be corrected to the usual wikipedia standards.
Nachoseli (
talk)
12:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
'cherry picking' does not need an image of a cherry