This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
How can its HDI be right if all states comprising it have bigger values?
Region -> .875
RS -> .872
SC -> .921
PR -> .913
There is no reference about the all-Ukrainian cities in Paraná and Santa Catarina! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.40.94.220 ( talk) 03:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
and you could win $1 if you say whats brazils culture —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.227.66.203 (
talk)
03:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
This part of the article is nonsense:
"and there is fluency of the Spanish language in the population by the proximity to Spanish-speaking countries of Uruguay and Argentina.[citation needed]"
There is no fluency in Spanish in South of Brazil. First, only parts of the South region are close to Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina. Second, what happens is that brazilian, as any portuguese speaker, can undertand spanish more or less (the contrary is not true, spanish speakers don;t understand spoken portuguese in general) but there's no fluency in Spanish at all.
I'm taking this part out of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.84.43 ( talk) 13:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Skin color/Race (2008)[10]
White (European, Caucasian) 78.65%
Brown (Multiracial) 16.98% <-------------
Black (African) 3.50%
Yellow (Asian) 0.49% <----------
Red (Amerindian) 0.31% <------------
Undeclared 0.06% — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.247.190 ( talk) 14:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
I heard in places that an independence movement exists or existed in South Brazil. Other articles for different regions (Basque nationalism, Scottish nationlism, etc.) exist, should there not be a mention or a link to an article about this? 73.11.81.111 ( talk) 06:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on South Region, Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)